Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Settle the descent rate
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,310 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 597 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The Skyward C680 taxied from the parking area to runway 26R at EDDM Munich Airport in 16 minutes, covering 4 nm.
During the departure roll on runway 26R, the aircraft accelerated to a liftoff speed of 120 kt and left the ground after traveling 2,398 m, which represented 60 % of the runway length. Ambient conditions were 25 °C with a wind of 3 kt from 316°, a cross-wind component of 3 kt and a head-wind component of 2 kt.
Climb commenced one mile west of EDDM, with the airplane ascending from 2,441 ft asl to 45,048 ft asl, a gain of 42,607 ft achieved in 20 minutes while covering 122 nm.
Cruise began five miles west of Malta (Kärnten, Austria) and was maintained for 57 minutes, during which the aircraft flew 439 nm at level altitude.
Descent was initiated thirteen miles west of Kavaje (Tirana, Albania), with the aircraft descending from 45,118 ft asl to 1,850 ft asl, a loss of 43,268 ft over 23 minutes and a distance of 141 nm.
The final approach to runway 34 at LGKR Corfu Ioannis Kapodistrias International Airport was conducted from the south on a heading of 346.0° at 3 nm and 1,818 ft agl, followed by a further descent from 1,988 ft agl to 66 ft agl in 85 seconds, during which the aircraft scored on the stabilisation gates.
Landing on runway 34 was performed with a threshold speed of 116 kt; touchdown occurred 224 m beyond the touchdown zone at a speed of 102 kt and a vertical rate of minus 103 fpm. The touchdown point was offset 4.6 m from the centreline. Local weather at the time was 26 °C with a wind of 2 kt from 250°, a cross-wind component of 2 kt and no head-wind.
Runway rollout covered a total landing distance of 1,435 m, representing 62 % of the runway length, and the alignment during rollout was reported as very good.
After landing, the aircraft taxied from the runway to the parking area in 9 minutes, traversing 12 nm.
In total, the flight covered 726 nm, took 119 minutes, and consumed 1,304 kg of fuel.
The final approach to runway 34 at LGKR Corfu was flown from the south on a heading of 346.0° at 3 nm and 1,818 ft agl. At the 1,000 ft gate the approach was assessed as unstable, with a sink rate too high and the aircraft off the glideslope.
During the threshold and flare phase the aircraft descended from 1,988 ft agl to 66 ft agl in 85 seconds. Threshold height was good and the threshold speed was good at 116 kt.
Touchdown occurred 224 m beyond the touchdown zone with a touchdown speed of 102 kt, which was good. The touchdown rate was smooth at minus 103 fpm and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.6 m from the centreline.
Rollout used a total landing distance of 1,435 m, representing 62 % of the 2,310 m runway, and rollout alignment was very good.
Coaching should focus on achieving a stabilized approach by controlling sink rate and maintaining the glideslope to meet the 1,000 ft gate criteria, and on aiming to touch down within the designated touchdown zone to reduce the 224 m overshoot and improve centreline alignment.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values