Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 5.6 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 26 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 26 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 26 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 4,001 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 584 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 03 at Yangon International Airport (VYYY) in Yangon, Myanmar. The takeoff distance was 1,512 meters, which is 44% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 159 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it encountered local weather conditions of 36°C temperature and a wind speed of 2 knots at 70°. The crosswind was 1 knot, and the headwind was 2 knots. The enroute climb started 1 mile northeast of Yangon International Airport and reached an altitude of 36,977 feet above sea level (asl) from an initial altitude of 1,011 feet asl. This climb took 42 minutes and covered a distance of 329 nautical miles.
After reaching the cruising altitude, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 18 miles southwest of Sainyabuli in Laos. This phase lasted for 193 minutes and covered a distance of 1,815 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent from 36,796 feet asl to 7,523 feet asl, a decrease of 29,273 feet in 24 minutes and covering 182 nautical miles.
The aircraft entered another level cruise phase, which started 5 miles west of Ishii in Japan and lasted for 3 minutes, covering less than 1 nautical mile. It then began its descent from 7,263 feet asl to 4,697 feet asl, a decrease of 2,567 feet in 3 minutes and covering 17 nautical miles. The aircraft entered another level cruise phase, which started 3 miles east of RJOS Tokushima Awaodori Airport/JMSDF Tokushima Air Base in Japan and lasted for 2 minutes, covering 2 nautical miles.
The aircraft then began its descent from 4,463 feet asl to 2,704 feet asl, a decrease of 1,759 feet in 3 minutes and covering 16 nautical miles. It entered another level cruise phase, which started 6 miles southeast of Sumoto in Japan and lasted for 5 minutes, covering 10 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 06L at Kansai International Airport (RJBB) was made from the southwest, heading 51.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,304 feet above ground level (agl). The landing was made on runway 06L, which has a length of 4,001 meters. The threshold height at 58 feet agl was slightly above the target, but the threshold speed was good at 136 knots.
The touchdown point was 169 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 127 knots, which was good. The touchdown rate was also good at -182 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.2 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 8°C temperature and a wind speed of 3 knots at 40°, with a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 3 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,064 meters, which is 27% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took less than 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 2,376 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 274 minutes. The aircraft used 12,872 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at RJBB Kansai International Airport on runway 06L, achieving a high score of 92.7%. The final approach was initiated from the southwest, heading 51.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,304 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft's approach to the runway was characterized by a slightly above-target threshold height of 58 feet agl, but the threshold speed was satisfactory at 136 knots. The touchdown point was located 169 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight deviation from the intended landing spot. However, the touchdown speed of 127 knots was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -182 feet per minute (fpm) was also good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were relatively calm, with a temperature of 8°C and a wind speed of 3 knots from a direction of 40°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot, while the headwind component was 3 knots. These conditions likely contributed to a smooth and stable approach.
The total landing distance of 1,064 meters was 27% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft's brakes were applied smoothly and effectively, and the pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the aircraft's performance was satisfactory. However, the slight deviation from the intended touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being slightly misaligned from the centreline may indicate areas for improvement in the pilot's landing technique.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values