Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 3.7°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 21 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 21 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 21 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,908 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,908 m of the 2,319 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 962 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with taxiing from the parking area to the runway, which took 11 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 09 at the VIJP Jaipur International Airport, with a takeoff distance of 761 meters, which accounted for 22% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 138 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 20 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 5 knots at an angle of 49 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 4 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile east of the airport, and climbed from an altitude of 2,278 feet above sea level to 8,126 feet above sea level, an increase of 5,849 feet, in just 2 minutes, covering a distance of 8 nautical miles.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 3 minutes and covered a distance of 16 nautical miles, starting 5 miles northeast of Jaipur. The aircraft then began another climb phase, this time from 8,257 feet above sea level to 25,027 feet above sea level, an increase of 16,771 feet, in 7 minutes, covering a distance of 45 nautical miles, starting 9 miles southwest of Shahpura.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, lasting 3 minutes and covering a distance of 22 nautical miles, starting 6 miles west of Narnaul. The aircraft then began its descent phase, starting 2 miles west of Kanina Khas, and descended from 24,106 feet above sea level to 2,995 feet above sea level, a decrease of 21,111 feet, in 12 minutes, covering a distance of 59 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, lasting 8 minutes and covering a distance of 15 nautical miles, starting 4 miles southeast of Faridabad. The final approach to runway 29L at the VIDP Indira Gandhi International Airport was made from the east, with a heading of 284.0 degrees at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,264 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 29L was successful, with the touchdown point being 582 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was slightly above the target speed at 126 knots, but the touchdown rate was smooth at -116 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 7.2 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 11 degrees Celsius.
The total landing distance was 1,864 meters, which accounted for 80% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing from the runway to the parking area took 5 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 173 nautical miles, taking 47 minutes, and the aircraft used 575 kilograms of fuel.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed at Indira Gandhi International Airport, VIDP, on runway 29L. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 284.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,264 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's performance during the landing was evaluated, and it scored 82.2%.
The aircraft's approach to the runway was satisfactory, with the threshold height being above the target at 60 feet agl. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 126 knots. This indicates that the aircraft may have been slightly fast during the approach, which could have been a concern for the pilots.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft landed 582 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a significant deviation from the intended landing point. The touchdown speed of 109 knots was also a little fast, indicating that the pilots may have been unable to slow down the aircraft sufficiently before touchdown. Fortunately, the touchdown rate was smooth at -116 feet per minute (fpm), which suggests that the aircraft's descent was controlled and stable.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 7.2 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to the aircraft's deviation from the intended landing point. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 11°C.
The total landing distance of 1,864 meters was 80% of the runway length, which is a relatively long distance. However, the runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft's brakes were applied smoothly and effectively after touchdown. Overall, while the landing was not perfect, the aircraft's performance was satisfactory, and the pilots were able to bring the aircraft to a safe stop.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values