Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Track the centreline through touchdown using small rudder corrections against a point at the far end of the runway.
What happened: The aircraft touched down off the centreline at 8.1 m, and drifting off centreline at touchdown usually carries through into the rollout, as it did here with alignment reaching 13 m.
Watch for: Watch runway centreline position, keeping deviation inside the limit through touchdown and rollout.
Below 10,000 ft you are typically limited to 250 kt indicated (a US rule that much of the world mirrors in some form, though not universally). This forces a deceleration around 10,000 ft whether the profile wants one or not, so plan for it rather than discovering it.
Start to finish · 15 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,692 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 407 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Taxiing from the parking area to the runway at UBBB Heydar Aliyev International Airport took approximately one minute, covering less than one nautical mile. The Phenom 300E then began its departure roll on runway 35, utilizing 23% of the 3,063-meter runway to achieve a takeoff distance of 763 meters. Liftoff speed was reached at 122 knots, with a local temperature of 28 degrees Celsius and a wind of 15 knots at 330 degrees. The crosswind component was 7 knots, while the headwind component was 13 knots.
The enroute climb phase commenced overhead UBBB, with the aircraft ascending from 928 feet above sea level to 45,003 feet, an increase of 44,075 feet in 17 minutes, covering 61 nautical miles. The climb was followed by a level cruise phase, which started 5 miles northwest of Qobustan and lasted 41 minutes, covering 892 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its descent phase, starting 5 miles north of Gulnar, Turkey, and descending from 44,995 feet to 2,507 feet in 26 minutes, covering 134 nautical miles. A brief level cruise phase followed, lasting 3 minutes and covering 6 nautical miles, before the aircraft began its final descent phase, starting 2 miles west of Pissouri, Cyprus. The descent from 2,488 feet to 1,305 feet took 2 minutes, covering 4 nautical miles.
The Phenom 300E then commenced its final approach to runway 29 at LCPH Paphos International Airport, approaching from the east at a heading of 290.0 degrees. The aircraft landed on the 2,692-meter runway, with a touchdown distance of 406 meters and a touchdown speed of 102 knots. The touchdown rate was excellent at -63 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline by 10 meters. The total landing distance was 1,111 meters, utilizing 41% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned from the centerline by 14.6 meters. The total flight distance was 1,103 nautical miles, taking 95 minutes, and the aircraft used 1,342 kilograms of fuel.
The aircraft touched down on runway 29 at LCPH Paphos International Airport with a good threshold height, indicating a well-executed approach. The threshold speed of 100 kt was slightly below the target, but still within acceptable limits. The touchdown distance of 406 m was satisfactory, and the touchdown speed of 102 kt was also good. Notably, the touchdown rate of -63 fpm was excellent, demonstrating a high degree of control and precision.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's runway touchdown position was found to be misaligned by 10.0 m from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the approach or a minor issue with the aircraft's directional control. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 27 °C and a headwind of 16 kt, may have also played a role in the slight misalignment. The total landing distance of 1,111 m, which accounted for 41% of the runway, was within acceptable limits.
During the rollout phase, the aircraft's alignment was found to be slightly misaligned by 14.6 m from the centreline, which was a minor deviation from the desired path. Despite this, the overall performance of the landing was satisfactory, with a final score of 89.2%. The approach quality, touchdown characteristics, and rollout alignment all contributed to a successful landing, although there were some minor deviations from the ideal performance.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values