Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 59 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 17 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,996 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 534 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the Airbus A320 taxiing from the parking area to the runway at London Heathrow Airport, taking 16 minutes and covering a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 27R, with a takeoff distance of 1,558 meters, which accounted for 43% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 162 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were a temperature of 10 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 4 knots at 239 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed to its cruising altitude, it started its enroute climb overhead Harmondsworth in Greater London, England. The climb took 13 minutes and covered a distance of 70 nautical miles, with the aircraft rising from an altitude of 1,103 feet above sea level to 29,615 feet above sea level, an increase of 28,512 feet. The enroute level cruise then began overhead Nacton in Suffolk, England, and lasted for 45 minutes, covering a distance of 357 nautical miles.
The enroute descent started 3 miles north-east of EK38 Nordborg Poel Nordborg in Region Syddanmark, Denmark, and took 24 minutes to complete, covering a distance of 104 nautical miles. The aircraft descended from an altitude of 29,516 feet above sea level to 1,292 feet above sea level, a decrease of 28,224 feet. The final approach to runway 22R at Copenhagen Kastrup Airport was made from the north-east, with the aircraft heading 221.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,271 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway.
The landing on runway 22R was successful, with the touchdown point being 107 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 126 knots, which was good, and the touchdown rate was fair at -272 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway rollout alignment was perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 12 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 16 knots at 200 degrees.
The total landing distance was 1,325 meters, which accounted for 44% of the runway. The total flight distance was 540 nautical miles, and the flight took 97 minutes to complete. The aircraft used a total of -4,814 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed on runway 22R at EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport, achieving a high score of 98.1%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north east, heading 221.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,271 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with good control, and the aircraft touched down on the runway with a speed of 126 kt, which was within the acceptable range.
The touchdown point was 107 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, indicating a slight deviation from the ideal landing spot. However, the touchdown speed was good, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good, suggesting that the pilot maintained a stable and controlled approach. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 12°C, with a wind speed of 16 kt from 200°. The crosswind component was 6 kt, while the headwind component was 15 kt, which may have contributed to the slight deviation from the touchdown zone.
The total landing distance was 1,325 meters, which accounted for 44% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot executed a smooth and controlled approach. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, suggesting that the pilot maintained a stable and controlled descent during the landing phase. Overall, the landing was executed with good control and precision, resulting in a high score of 98.1%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values