Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 152 m above the runway. The 305 m gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,671 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,671 m of the 1,891 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 811 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The 1.70 G arrival is the firm side of smooth.
The rest of the report
While your landing score may have been below the target, it is important to remember that every landing provides an opportunity for improvement. It's great that you are analyzing your performance and looking for ways to enhance your skills.
In the Landing Phase, it seems like there were a few areas that could use some improvement. The threshold height being excessively over target may have contributed to a less than ideal landing flare. Additionally, poor landing heading and bank angle stability can affect the overall smoothness of the landing. It may be helpful to focus on maintaining a steady approach and ensuring proper alignment with the runway.
Moving on to the Touchdown Phase, it appears that there were several factors that could have contributed to the lower score. A hard touchdown rate could mean that the descent was not as controlled as it could have been. Touching down 478 m beyond the touchdown zone is quite a distance and may suggest that adjustments need to be made in timing and approach. Ensuring that your speed is within the target range can also help with a smoother touchdown.
In the Rollout Phase, runway alignment is crucial for a successful landing. Being 8.1 m from the centerline indicates that there may have been some difficulty in maintaining a straight path post-touchdown. It may be helpful to work on centerline tracking and adjusting as needed to maintain alignment.
Overall, while your landing score may not have been as high as you would have liked, it's important to view this as an opportunity for growth and learning. By addressing the areas that need improvement, such as approach stability, touchdown control, and runway alignment, you can work towards achieving a more successful landing in future flights. Keep practicing and refining your skills, and you will see improvement over time. Keep up the good work and stay focused on becoming a more proficient aviator.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values