Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 25 stages, 23 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,792 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 189 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, I would like to commend the pilot for achieving a landing score of 90.8%. This is a solid performance, indicating a high level of skill and proficiency in handling the aircraft during the different phases of landing.
During the Approach Phase, it is important to maintain a descent path within the glideslope limits to ensure a safe and smooth landing. In this case, the descent path was below the glideslope limit, which could have contributed to a slightly off-target speed. However, this is a minor issue that can be easily corrected with practice and attention to detail.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is great to see that the pilot had good threshold height and executed an excellent landing flare. These are key elements of a successful landing and indicate a strong understanding of proper landing techniques. However, the poor bank angle stability during landing is an area that could use improvement. Ensuring stable bank angles during landing can help enhance overall control and accuracy during this critical phase.
In the Touchdown Phase, the firm touchdown rate may indicate a slightly heavy landing, but the speed being on target and the touchdown distance inside the touchdown zone are positive aspects. The runway touchdown position being 3.7 meters from the centerline shows good precision in aligning the aircraft with the runway.
Finally, during the Rollout Phase, it is noted that the runway alignment was slightly off, being 15.2 meters from the centerline. Improving runway alignment can result in smoother taxiing and overall better control of the aircraft after landing.
Overall, this landing performance demonstrates a strong foundation of skills and techniques, with room for minor improvements in areas such as descent path management, bank angle stability, and runway alignment. With continued practice and attention to detail, I am confident that the pilot can strive for even higher scores in future landings. Keep up the great work and continue honing your skills to achieve even greater success in your flying endeavors.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values