Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,742 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 460 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the landing score of 88.4% indicates a solid performance with room for improvement in certain areas. Let's break down the analysis of each phase of the landing to identify strengths and areas for growth.
Starting with the Approach Phase, the descent path being below the glideslope limit is a common issue that can be easily corrected with careful attention to instrumentation and making timely adjustments. This is an area where practice and focus can lead to significant improvement.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's great to see that the threshold height was good, indicating good awareness of altitude during the final approach. However, the poor landing flare suggests that there may have been some difficulty in smoothly transitioning from descent to touchdown. This is an important skill to master, as a proper flare can help ensure a smoother and safer landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, the heavy touchdown rate and slightly above target speed suggest a need for better control and finesse during the final moments before touchdown. Additionally, while it's positive that the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone, there is room for improvement in achieving a more precise touchdown position closer to the centerline.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 10.1m from the centerline indicates some difficulty in maintaining alignment during the rollout. This can be improved through practice and focus on maintaining proper alignment with the runway.
Overall, this landing score of 88.4% is a strong starting point, and with attention to detail and practice in the areas identified, there is great potential for improvement. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of aircraft landing. You're on the right track!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values