Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Rotate sooner, bringing the nose up at 179 kt rather than letting speed build further.
What happened: You lifted off at 202 kt against a rotation target of 179 kt, rotating late in the ground roll.
Watch for: Watch airspeed and rotate at the target of 179 kt.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Hold the aim point and wait for the speed to bleed before raising the nose, starting the flare within the normal band instead of 71 ft.
What happened: The flare began at 71 ft, 26 ft earlier than the normal band.
Watch for: Radio altimeter: start the flare within the normal flare band
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: off the runway's 3° glideslope.
At the 500 ft gate: off the runway's 3° glideslope and speed below the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,813 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,813 m of the 2,840 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 661 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 5 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 777-300, then departed from runway 17R at Comodoro Arturo Merino Benítez International Airport in Santiago, Chile. The takeoff distance was 2,627 meters, which accounted for 69% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 202 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 16 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 2 knots from a direction of 145 degrees. The crosswind was 1 knot, while the headwind was 2 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile south of the airport and reaching an altitude of 34,000 feet above sea level. This climb phase covered a distance of 109 nautical miles and took 20 minutes, with the aircraft ascending by 31,435 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 14 miles northwest of Punta Chungo Airport in Los Vilos, Chile. This phase lasted for 519 minutes and covered a distance of 4,074 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 4 miles northeast of Canadian River Ranch Airport in Adrian, Texas, and descending from 36,316 feet to 2,355 feet above sea level. This descent phase took 27 minutes and covered a distance of 110 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 13R at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport was made from the northwest, with the aircraft heading 140.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,790 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on the runway, which had a length of 2,840 meters. The threshold height was well above the target, but the threshold speed was good at 152 knots.
The touchdown point was 247 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 140 knots and a firm touchdown rate of -328 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 10.0 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 28 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 6 knots from a direction of 100 degrees. The crosswind was 4 knots, while the headwind was 5 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,733 meters, which accounted for 61% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 10.1 meters from the centerline. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 5 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 4,306 nautical miles, taking a total of 581 minutes and consuming 86,890 kilograms of fuel.
The Boeing 777-300 aircraft successfully landed on runway 13R at KDFW Dallas Fort Worth International Airport, achieving an overall score of 82.2%. The final approach was initiated from the northwest, heading 140.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,790 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft's approach to the runway was characterized by a threshold height that was well above the target, indicating a safe margin for landing. The threshold speed was also satisfactory, reaching 152 knots. Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed was 140 knots, which was within the acceptable range. The touchdown rate was firm, with a descent rate of -328 feet per minute (fpm), indicating a controlled and stable landing.
However, there were some minor issues with the landing. The touchdown point was 247 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight over-shooting of the target. Additionally, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 10.0 meters from the centerline, which could potentially affect the aircraft's rollout and braking performance.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 28°C and a gentle wind of 6 knots at 100°. The crosswind component was minimal at 4 knots, while the headwind component was 5 knots. These conditions likely contributed to a smooth and stable approach.
The total landing distance was 1,733 meters, which accounted for 61% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to decelerate quickly and efficiently after touchdown. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 10.1 meters from the centerline, which may require some adjustments to the aircraft's braking and steering performance.
Overall, the landing was successful, but there are some areas for improvement, particularly with regards to the touchdown point and runway alignment. With some adjustments to the approach and landing technique, the aircraft's performance can be further optimized to achieve a higher score.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values