Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,759 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,759 m of the 3,716 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 936 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, your aircraft landing score of 77.6% shows that there were both strengths and areas for improvement in the different phases of the landing process.
In the Approach Phase, it is noted that there was a poor descent path above the glideslope limit and speed was slightly above target. To improve in this area, it is important to maintain a steady descent path within the glideslope limits and ensure that the aircraft's speed is consistently within the target range.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height was significantly above target and the landing flare was very poor. A proper landing flare is essential for a smooth touchdown, so practicing and refining this technique will help improve your overall landing performance.
Despite these areas for improvement, the Touchdown Phase showcased some positive aspects such as an excellent touchdown rate and being on target with speed. However, it is important to note that the touchdown point was 459 meters beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a need to work on aligning the aircraft with the designated touchdown area.
Additionally, landing with an 8 knot tailwind is a safety concern and should be avoided in future landings. Tailwinds can increase landing distances and compromise control during the landing phase.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was 16.6 meters off the centerline. Ensuring precise alignment with the runway centerline is crucial for a safe and controlled rollout.
In conclusion, while there were strengths in certain aspects of the landing, there are opportunities to enhance overall performance by focusing on maintaining proper descent paths, improving landing flare techniques, aligning with designated touchdown zones, avoiding tailwind landings, and ensuring precise runway alignment during rollout. Keep practicing and refining your skills to achieve smoother and more precise landings in the future. Your efforts will surely pay off in improved landing scores and overall flight safety.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values