Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Level the wings with coordinated aileron to hold bank angle near zero during the initial climb, starting from 2.2°.
What happened: Bank angle was elevated during the initial climb and excess bank usually persists into the second climb segment.
Watch for: Attitude indicator, wings level with bank angle near zero degrees.
Arrival
Keep the back pressure coming once the flare is established, holding the nose up through to touchdown instead of easing it.
What happened: The flare arrested the sink but 229 fpm of it came back before touchdown, and in flights like this one that returning sink usually carries through to a firm or hard touchdown at 233 fpm.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: the sink held near zero all the way through touchdown, not allowed to build back up.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 500 ft gate: speed below the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,857 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,857 m of the 2,561 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 965 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
LOWI Innsbruck Airport's runway 26 was the departure point for the Boeing 737-800, which began its journey with a taxiing period of less than 1 nm and 6 minutes. The aircraft then accelerated down the 1,440-meter runway, utilizing 76% of its length, and lifted off at a speed of 152 kt. The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 18 °C, a wind speed of 2 kt from 270°, and a negligible crosswind component.
As the aircraft climbed away from LOWI, it began its enroute climb 1 mile north of Birgitz, Tirol, Austria, at an altitude of 2,895 ft asl. The climb phase was completed 19 minutes later, with the aircraft reaching a cruising altitude of 35,033 ft asl, an increase of 32,138 ft. The enroute climb covered a distance of 117 nm. The aircraft then entered a series of level cruises, with the first occurring overhead Gardone Val Trompia, Lombardia, Italy, lasting 2 minutes and covering 47 nm. The subsequent level cruises took place over Badalucco, Liguria, Italy, and 20 miles south of San Lorenzo al Mare, Liguria, Italy, with durations of 2 minutes and 16 minutes, respectively, and covering distances of 8 nm and 64 nm.
As the aircraft began its descent from the cruising altitude, it started its initial descent 1 mile south-east of Stradella, Lombardia, Italy, and continued to descend in stages, with the final descent taking place 2 miles south of Cannes, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France. The aircraft landed on runway 04L at LFMN Nice-Côte d'Azur Airport, with a total landing distance of 1,779 m, 69% of the runway length. The touchdown point was 552 m beyond the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.1 m from the centreline. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area, covering a distance of 1 nm in 5 minutes. The total flight distance was 364 nm, and the aircraft used 4,285 kg of fuel during the flight, which lasted 69 minutes.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 04L at LFMN Nice-Côte d'Azur Airport with a threshold speed of 145 kt, meeting the target. The aircraft's approach quality was satisfactory, with a slight deviation in threshold height, being 57 ft agl, which was above the target. The touchdown point was 552 m beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slightly longer than ideal landing distance.
The touchdown speed of 131 kt was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -282 fpm was fair, suggesting a moderate deceleration. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.1 m from the centreline, which may have been due to crosswind or pilot error. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 15 °C and a light wind of 2 kt at 270 °, were generally favorable for landing.
The total landing distance of 1,779 m was 69% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was well under control during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 88.7%, indicating a good but not exceptional landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values