Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down earlier
See Arrival Final 1
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,360 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 228 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, the Boeing 737-600 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the designated runway, a process that took approximately 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. As the aircraft lined up on runway 24, it was ready to depart, with a takeoff distance of 797 meters, which equated to 25% of the runway length. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 141 knots, taking advantage of the 8-knot headwind and minimal crosswind.
As the aircraft climbed out of Amsterdam, it began its enroute climb, reaching an altitude of 38,571 feet above sea level in 29 minutes, covering a distance of 235 nautical miles. The climb started approximately 1 mile north of Aalsmeerderbrug, and the aircraft continued to ascend, eventually reaching a cruising altitude. The enroute level cruise lasted for 41 minutes, during which the aircraft covered 345 nautical miles, maintaining a steady course at a latitude of 56.1265566 and longitude of 4.5269589. As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its enroute descent, starting 17 miles northeast of Farnes, Norway. The descent from 39,004 feet to 1,269 feet took 20 minutes, covering 140 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached Trondheim Airport, Værnes, it began its final approach to runway 09, aligning itself with the runway from the west at a heading of 90.0 degrees. The aircraft touched down on the runway at a speed of 119 knots, with a touchdown distance of 225 meters, which was 28% of the runway length. The touchdown rate was -159 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took less than 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 725 nautical miles, and the aircraft used 4,384 kilograms of fuel during the journey, which lasted a total of 94 minutes.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down smoothly on runway 09 at ENVA Trondheim Airport, Værnes, after a well-executed approach from the west. The aircraft maintained a heading of 90.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,216 feet above ground level, aligning perfectly with the runway. The approach quality was excellent, with a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 123 knots, well within the acceptable range.
As the aircraft made contact with the runway, it exhibited good touchdown characteristics, with a touchdown speed of 119 knots and a touchdown rate of -159 feet per minute, indicating a controlled and stable descent. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, with the aircraft centered on the runway. The touchdown distance of 225 meters was also within the acceptable range, demonstrating the pilot's skill in managing the aircraft's descent and speed.
Following touchdown, the aircraft rolled out smoothly, maintaining perfect alignment with the runway centerline. The total landing distance of 660 meters, which accounted for only 28% of the runway length, was impressive, showcasing the pilot's expertise in managing the aircraft's speed and descent. Overall, the landing was scored 98.7%, reflecting the high level of proficiency demonstrated by the pilot.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values