Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 6.8 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Fly a steeper descent on final so you cross the threshold at 50 ft.
What happened: You crossed the threshold at 125 ft agl, above the 50 ft agl target. Crossing high like this usually reduces your margin before the touchdown zone ends.
Watch for: Radio altimeter against 50 ft at the threshold.
See Arrival Landing
Even a modest height error carries straight through to the touchdown. Geometry alone says that crossing the threshold 10 feet high on a 3° path moves your touchdown roughly 190 feet further down the runway before the flare adds anything.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,195 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 386 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A319, then departed from runway 09 at Grantley Adams International Airport in Barbados. The takeoff distance was 2,117 meters, which was 63% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 170 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 31 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 21 knots from a direction of 110 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 12 knots and a headwind of 17 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile southwest of Crane in Saint Philip, Barbados. The climb took 23 minutes and covered a distance of 141 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from 978 feet above sea level to 33,578 feet above sea level, an increase of 32,601 feet.
After reaching the cruising altitude, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 1 mile west of Saint-Pierre in Martinique. This phase lasted for 272 minutes and covered a distance of 1,899 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 1 mile northwest of the Gentzke Aeronautical Park Airport in New York, United States. The descent took 19 minutes and covered a distance of 76 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 33,203 feet above sea level to 3,012 feet above sea level, a decrease of 30,190 feet.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 1 mile northeast of Malvern in Ontario, Canada. This phase lasted for 8 minutes and covered a distance of 17 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 23 at Toronto Lester B. Pearson International Airport, flying from the northeast at a heading of 226.0 degrees and at an altitude of 1,560 feet above ground level. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of -11 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 20 knots from a direction of 250 degrees, resulting in a crosswind of 8 knots and a headwind of 19 knots.
The aircraft landed on runway 23, which had a length of 3,195 meters. The threshold height at 125 feet above ground level was excessively over target, while the threshold speed was slightly above target at 141 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 388 meters, and the touchdown speed was also good at 125 knots. The touchdown rate was firm at -358 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 13.9 meters from the centerline.
The total landing distance was 891 meters, which was 28% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 13.3 meters from the centerline. The aircraft then taxied to the parking from the runway, which took 4 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 2,142 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 335 minutes. The aircraft used 13,668 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A319 aircraft successfully landed at Toronto Lester B. Pearson International Airport (CYYZ) on runway 23. The final approach was initiated from the northeast, heading 226.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,560 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's performance during the landing was evaluated, and the results showed a score of 82.7%.
The aircraft's approach to the runway threshold was slightly above the target height, with a height of 125 feet agl, which was excessively over the target. However, the threshold speed was also slightly above the target at 141 knots. The touchdown distance of 388 meters was considered good, and the touchdown speed of 125 knots was also within the acceptable range. The touchdown rate of -358 feet per minute (fpm) was firm, indicating a controlled descent.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of -11°C and a wind speed of 20 knots from 250°. The crosswind component was 8 knots, while the headwind component was 19 knots. These conditions presented a moderate challenge for the aircraft's landing.
The aircraft's runway touchdown position was misaligned by 13.9 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to the wind conditions or pilot error. The total landing distance of 891 meters was 28% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. However, the runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned by 13.3 meters from the centerline, indicating a slight deviation from the desired path.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with a score of 82.7%. While there were some minor deviations from the target parameters, the aircraft's performance was generally good, and the pilots were able to maintain control throughout the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values