Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.5 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,352 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 510 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-600, then departed from runway 25 at EPKK Kraków John Paul II International Airport. The takeoff distance was 539 meters, which accounted for 23% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 141 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of -5°C and a wind speed of 0 knots at 179 degrees. There was no crosswind or headwind. The aircraft began its enroute climb overhead Aleksandrowice in the Lesser Poland Voivodeship, Poland. The climb started from an altitude of 1,715 feet above sea level and reached a maximum altitude of 35,989 feet above sea level, an increase of 34,274 feet in 30 minutes. The aircraft covered a distance of 219 nautical miles during this period.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 1 mile north of Radibor in Saxony, Germany. This phase lasted for 33 minutes and covered a distance of 236 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent from an altitude of 35,746 feet above sea level to 1,988 feet above sea level, a decrease of 33,757 feet in 20 minutes. The descent covered a distance of 120 nautical miles and started 1 mile north of Versmold in Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 1 mile north of Muiderberg in the Provincie Noord-Holland, The Netherlands. This phase lasted for 3 minutes and covered a distance of 9 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 27 at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol was made from the east, heading 267.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,277 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 27 at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol was successful, with a runway length of 3,352 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was well above the target at 134 knots. The touchdown point was 90 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was a little fast at 119 knots. However, the touchdown rate was good at -179 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 9°C and a wind speed of 7 knots at 260 degrees. There was a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 7 knots. The total landing distance was 915 meters, which accounted for 27% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 589 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 92 minutes. The aircraft used 4,502 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-600 aircraft successfully landed at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, achieving a high score of 98.7%. The final approach to runway 27 was conducted from the east, with a heading of 267.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,277 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down 90 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is slightly outside the ideal landing spot. However, the touchdown speed of 119 knots was a bit faster than the target speed, indicating that the pilots may have been able to make adjustments to achieve a smoother touchdown. The touchdown rate of -179 feet per minute (fpm) was considered good, suggesting that the aircraft was able to absorb the impact of landing smoothly.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 9°C and a wind speed of 7 knots from a direction of 260°. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 7 knots, which the pilots effectively managed during the landing. The runway length at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol is 3,352 meters, providing a sufficient margin for the aircraft to land safely.
The total landing distance of 915 meters was 27% of the available runway length, indicating that the aircraft was able to land within a reasonable distance. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, suggesting that the pilots maintained control of the aircraft during the landing and rollout phases. Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score and demonstrating good control and management of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values