Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,594 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 541 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The Airbus A320 then departed from runway 17 at ENBR Bergen Airport, Flesland, with a takeoff distance of 1,258 meters, which accounted for 52% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 170 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 7°C and a wind speed of 9 knots from a direction of 190°. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 9 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile south of Flesland, and ascended from an altitude of 1,197 feet above sea level to 24,153 feet above sea level, an increase of 22,956 feet, in 12 minutes and covering a distance of 89 nautical miles.
As the aircraft continued its journey, it began its enroute descent, starting 6 miles southwest of ENDI Geilo Airport Dagali Dagali. The descent from 24,408 feet above sea level to 9,100 feet above sea level, a decrease of 15,309 feet, took 5 minutes and covered a distance of 65 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, lasting 3 minutes and covering 16 nautical miles, starting 5 miles southwest of Eina.
The enroute descent phase resumed, starting 5 miles north of Lena, and the aircraft descended from 9,076 feet above sea level to 1,976 feet above sea level, a decrease of 7,100 feet, in 8 minutes and covering a distance of 30 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 19R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, was made from the north, with a heading of 196.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,293 feet above ground level.
The landing on runway 19R was successful, with a touchdown point 121 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was a little fast at 128 knots, but the touchdown rate was good at -186 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the runway rollout alignment was also perfect. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 5°C and a wind speed of 11 knots from a direction of 220°, resulting in a crosswind of 4 knots and a headwind of 10 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,181 meters, which accounted for 33% of the runway. The taxiing to the parking area from the runway took 4 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 208 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 40 minutes. The aircraft used 2,101 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 98.9%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north, heading 196.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,293 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with precision, and the aircraft landed on runway 19R, which has a length of 3,594 meters.
The threshold height was good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct altitude as it approached the runway. The threshold speed of 135 knots was also within the acceptable range, demonstrating the pilot's ability to manage the aircraft's speed during the landing phase. However, the touchdown speed of 128 knots was slightly faster than the recommended speed, which may have resulted in a slightly longer landing distance.
The touchdown point was 121 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The touchdown rate of -186 feet per minute (fpm) was good, indicating that the aircraft touched down smoothly and without excessive deceleration. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, demonstrating the pilot's skill in aligning the aircraft with the runway centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were characterized by a temperature of 5°C and a wind speed of 11 knots from 220°. The crosswind component was 4 knots, while the headwind component was 10 knots. These conditions presented a moderate challenge for the pilot, but the aircraft's performance and the pilot's skills were sufficient to handle the wind.
The total landing distance was 1,181 meters, which is approximately 33% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to decelerate quickly and smoothly after touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was executed with a high degree of precision and skill, and the aircraft's performance was satisfactory in the given weather conditions. The score of 98.9% reflects the pilot's expertise and the aircraft's capabilities, and the landing was considered a success.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values