Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 13 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Begin the flare with progressive back pressure and keep it coming until the sink is arrested, rather than flying it on flat.
What happened: The nose was barely raised in the flare and little of the sink was taken out, flying the aircraft onto the runway. This pattern usually carries through to a firm touchdown with a noticeable sink rate.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smoothly reducing sink through the normal flare band, not a steady rate into the runway.
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 305 m and 152 m above the runway.
At the 152 m gate: off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,779 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 368 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 10 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-600, then departed from runway 17 at ENBR Bergen Airport, Flesland, with a takeoff distance of 1,031 meters, which accounted for 42% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 151 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 13 degrees Celsius and wind speeds of 26 knots at 149 degrees. The crosswind was 9 knots, while the headwind was 24 knots. After departing from Bergen, the aircraft began its enroute climb, which started overhead Flesland. The climb took the aircraft from an altitude of 372 meters above sea level to 10,798 meters above sea level, an increase of 10,426.7 meters, in 15 minutes and covering a distance of 72 nautical miles.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, which started 9 miles south east of Vassenden and lasted for 33 minutes. During this period, the aircraft covered a distance of 258 nautical miles. The enroute descent then began 9 miles north of Kolvereid, where the aircraft descended from 10,944 meters above sea level to 2,076 meters above sea level, a decrease of 8,867.1 meters, in 20 minutes and covering a distance of 119 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, which started 5 miles south west of Reipa and lasted for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 9 nautical miles. However, this was followed by another descent, which began 4 miles north of Reipa. The aircraft descended from 2,037 meters above sea level to 394 meters above sea level, a decrease of 1,643.7 meters, in 5 minutes and covering a distance of 20 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 07 at ENBO Bodø Airport was made from the west, with the aircraft heading 78.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 380.4 meters above ground level. The landing was made on runway 07, which had a length of 2,779 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also good at 123 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 367 meters, and the touchdown speed was 115 knots, which was also good.
However, the touchdown rate was fair at -1.4 meters per second, and the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 10.3 meters from the centreline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 12 degrees Celsius and wind speeds of 31 knots at 120 degrees. The crosswind was 21 knots, while the headwind was 23 knots. The total landing distance was 958 meters, which accounted for 34% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.0 meters from the centreline.
After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking from the runway, which took 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 485 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 88 minutes. The aircraft used 2,952 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-600 aircraft successfully landed at ENBO Bodø Airport, achieving a score of 94.9%. The final approach to runway 07 was initiated from the west, with a heading of 78.0° at an altitude of 380.4 meters above ground level (agl) and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on the runway with a speed of 123 knots, which was within the acceptable threshold speed. The touchdown distance of 367 meters was also within the expected range. However, the touchdown speed of 115 knots was slightly lower than the threshold speed, indicating a slightly early touchdown. The touchdown rate of -1.4 meters per second was considered fair, suggesting that the aircraft could have maintained a more controlled descent.
One notable issue during the landing was the misalignment of the runway touchdown position, which was off-centerline by 10.3 meters. This could have been due to various factors, including wind or pilot error. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 12°C, with a wind speed of 31 knots from a direction of 120°. The crosswind component was 21 knots, while the headwind component was 23 knots.
The total landing distance of 958 meters was 34% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 8.0 meters from the centerline, indicating that the aircraft may have deviated from the intended path during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was considered successful, with the aircraft achieving a high score of 94.9%. However, there were some minor issues with the touchdown position and rollout alignment, which could be addressed through further training or adjustments to the aircraft's handling characteristics.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values