Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the rollout
Ground control varies with speed, full authority at walking pace, progressively reducing as groundspeed rises. The aircraft becomes twitchy at any speed, every small pedal input swings the nose, which can encourage large-amplitude leg inputs that no real aircraft would accept.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,540 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 251 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Almería Airport, the Boeing 737-800 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 15 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. As it reached the runway, the aircraft started its departure roll on runway 25, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 158 knots. The takeoff distance of 1,801 meters accounted for 59% of the runway length, with a local temperature of 20°C and a gentle wind of 4 knots at 30 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed away from Almería, it began its enroute climb, reaching an altitude of 33,422 feet in 16 minutes and covering a distance of 91 nautical miles. The climb started 1 mile west of the airport and continued until the aircraft reached the enroute level cruise phase, which began 2 miles northeast of Jodar, Andalusia, Spain. During this phase, the aircraft maintained a steady altitude of 33,422 feet for 104 minutes, covering a distance of 763 nautical miles. The enroute descent phase started overhead Achy, Hauts-de-France, France, where the aircraft began its descent from 33,973 feet to 1,944 feet in 29 minutes, covering a distance of 154 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached Brussels South Charleroi Airport, it began its final approach to runway 24 from the northeast, heading 245.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,335 feet above ground level. The landing was executed with a threshold speed slightly above target at 143 knots, and the touchdown distance was good at 257 meters. However, the touchdown speed was a little fast at 138 knots, and the touchdown rate was good at -199 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.5 meters from the centerline. After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 3 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,018 nautical miles, taking 163 minutes, and the aircraft used 6,071 kilograms of fuel.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 24 at EBCI Brussels South Charleroi Airport with a good threshold height, allowing the crew to maintain a stable approach. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 143 kt, indicating a slight deviation from the optimal approach speed. Despite this, the touchdown distance was good at 257 m, demonstrating the crew's ability to control the aircraft's descent.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed was a little fast at 138 kt, but the touchdown rate of -199 fpm was good, indicating a controlled and stable touchdown. Unfortunately, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.5 m from the centreline, which may have been due to the crosswind component of 0 kt and headwind of 15 kt. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 6 °C and wind at 15 kt from 244 °, may have also contributed to the slight deviation from the centreline.
The total landing distance of 1,309 m was 62% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. The runway rollout alignment was very good, demonstrating the crew's ability to maintain control of the aircraft during the critical phase of the landing. Overall, the landing was scored 98.3%, reflecting the crew's good performance despite the slight deviations from the optimal approach and touchdown characteristics.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values