Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 16 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,295 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 446 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight in the Airbus A320 from TNCM Princess Juliana International Airport included taxiing from the parking to the runway, which took 6 minutes and covered less than 1 nm. The departure from runway 10 involved a takeoff distance of 842 m, with a liftoff speed of 164 kn. The local weather at the time indicated a temperature of 28 °C, with a wind speed of 15 kn at 40 °, resulting in a crosswind of 10 kn and headwind of 11 kn.
The departure climb from runway 10 involved reaching various altitudes, starting at 50 ft agl, then climbing to 400 ft agl, and finally reaching 1,000 ft agl before transitioning into an enroute climb. The enroute climb began overhead TNCM Princess Juliana International Airport, climbing from 1,019 ft asl to 9,331 ft asl in 3 minutes and covering 3 nm.
The enroute descent started 1 mile northeast of Marigot, descending from 9,405 ft asl to 1,888 ft asl in 6 minutes and covering 10 nm. The flight also included a brief enroute level cruise, lasting 3 minutes and covering 5 nm, before the final approach to runway 10 at TNCM Princess Juliana International Airport from the west.
The landing on runway 10 involved a touchdown point that was very long, using more than 50% of the available runway. The touchdown speed of 143 kn was a little fast, and the touchdown rate was very heavy at -848 ft/m. The touchdown position was misaligned by 14.1 m from the centerline. The total landing distance was 2,064 m, which was 90% of the runway length, with the runway rollout alignment misaligned by 25.8 m from the centerline.
After exiting the runway, the average speed was 22 kn. The total flight distance covered was 23 nm, taking 17 minutes, and using 723 kg of fuel. Overall, the flight in the Airbus A320 included various aspects of taxiing, takeoff, climb, descent, cruise, and landing, showcasing the performance of the aircraft in different phases of the flight.
First and foremost, it's important to acknowledge that receiving a score of 63.2% on an aircraft landing assessment is below the desired standard. However, receiving feedback on areas that need improvement is the first step towards enhancing your skills as a pilot.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it is noted that there were issues with maintaining a proper descent path above the glideslope limit. This is crucial for a safe and controlled landing. Additionally, having a slightly higher than target threshold speed at 143 knots indicates the need for better speed management during approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the excessive threshold height of 128 feet above ground level is a cause for concern as it could lead to potential safety risks. The mention of a very poor landing flare and poor bank angle stability during landing highlights the importance of achieving a smooth touchdown.
During the Touchdown Phase, the very heavy touchdown rate of -848 feet per minute is a sign of a hard landing, which can be damaging to the aircraft and uncomfortable for passengers. Additionally, landing at a speed of 143 knots, slightly above the desired speed, could have contributed to the heavy touchdown rate. Using more than 50% of the available runway for touchdown indicates a need for better runway management and planning.
Lastly, the misalignment of the runway touchdown position by 14.1 meters from the centerline is a significant deviation that needs to be corrected for safer landing procedures in the future.
In conclusion, while receiving less than satisfactory marks on your landing assessment can be disheartening, it's important to view this feedback as an opportunity for growth and improvement. By focusing on areas such as maintaining proper descent paths, speed management, flare technique, touchdown rate, and runway alignment, you can work towards achieving a higher score in future assessments. Remember, every landing is a learning experience, and with dedication and practice, you can strive towards becoming a more proficient pilot.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values