Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.8 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Fly the flare as one continuous check of the sink rate from 29 ft, holding back pressure steadily rather than adjusting pitch piecemeal.
What happened: The flare drifted away from its intended profile rather than tracking it smoothly from 29 ft down to touchdown.
Watch for: Watch radio altitude and VSI through the flare, aiming to arrest the sink smoothly from 29 ft to touchdown.
See Arrival Landing
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,895 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,895 m of the 3,984 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 768 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 777F, then departed from runway 08L at EDDM Munich Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,273 meters, which accounted for 32% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 169 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 4 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 6 knots at a direction of 50 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 3 knots and a headwind of 5 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile northeast of EDDM Munich Airport. The climb took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 46 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from 2,526 feet above sea level to 24,222 feet above sea level, an increase of 21,696 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, starting 3 miles northeast of Pappenheim. This phase of the flight lasted 14 minutes and covered a distance of 26 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 1 mile southwest of Ansbach. The descent took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 58 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 24,221 feet above sea level to 13,038 feet above sea level, a decrease of 11,182 feet.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise, starting 2 miles southeast of Heimbuchenthal. This phase of the flight lasted only 2 minutes and covered a distance of 10 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, starting overhead Grossostheim. The descent took 19 minutes and covered a distance of 25 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 13,055 feet above sea level to 1,481 feet above sea level, a decrease of 11,574 feet.
The final approach to runway 07R at EDDF Frankfurt Airport was made from the southwest, with a heading of 70.0 degrees at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,135 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 07R, which had a length of 3,984 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was well above the target at 158 knots.
The touchdown point was 353 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 150 knots and a touchdown rate of -181 feet per minute, both of which were good. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, and the runway rollout alignment was also very good. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 2 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 8 knots at a direction of 30 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 5 knots and a headwind of 6 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,816 meters, which accounted for 46% of the runway. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 175 nautical miles, and the flight took 54 minutes. The aircraft used 7,077 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 777F aircraft successfully landed at Frankfurt Airport (EDDF) on runway 07R, achieving a high score of 93.9%. The final approach was initiated from the southwest, heading 70.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,135 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft's approach was characterized by a good threshold height, indicating a stable and controlled descent.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's threshold speed was significantly above the target speed, reaching 158 knots. This suggests that the pilots had sufficient control over the aircraft's descent and were able to maintain a safe speed during the landing. The touchdown point was located 353 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation.
The touchdown speed of 150 knots was within the acceptable range, and the touchdown rate of -181 feet per minute (fpm) was also good, indicating a smooth and controlled touchdown. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, suggesting that the pilots had maintained a stable and aligned approach.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 2°C and a wind speed of 8 knots from a direction of 30°. The crosswind component was 5 knots, while the headwind component was 6 knots. These conditions presented a moderate challenge to the pilots, but they were able to successfully navigate the aircraft to a safe touchdown.
The total landing distance of 1,816 meters was 46% of the available runway length, which is a relatively short distance. This suggests that the pilots had made a good assessment of the aircraft's speed and descent rate, allowing for a smooth and controlled touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the pilots had maintained control over the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was characterized by a high degree of precision and control, with the pilots successfully navigating the aircraft to a safe touchdown despite challenging weather conditions. The score of 93.9% reflects the high level of proficiency and skill demonstrated by the pilots during this landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values