Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
On the roll, make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline within 6 m.
What happened: The takeoff roll drifted off the centreline by 6 m, and excess bank then carried through all three climb segments. A drifted roll like this usually leads into wandering bank angle through the climb.
Watch for: Watch the heading indicator and runway centreline during the roll, and the attitude indicator for wings level through the climb.
See Departure RollDeparture Climb 1Departure Climb 2Departure Climb 3
Below 10,000 ft you are typically limited to 250 kt indicated (a US rule that much of the world mirrors in some form, though not universally). This forces a deceleration around 10,000 ft whether the profile wants one or not, so plan for it rather than discovering it.
Read more in Descent PlanningStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,786 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,786 m of the 3,570 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 642 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Milano Linate Airport, the Airbus A320 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 6 minutes and covered 3 nautical miles. As it reached the runway threshold, the aircraft initiated its departure roll on runway 36, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 161 knots. The takeoff distance of 1,576 meters accounted for 64% of the available runway length, with the aircraft clearing the ground at a height of 1,306 feet above sea level.
As the aircraft climbed to its enroute cruise altitude, it passed overhead the Idroscalo Milan, marking the beginning of its ascent. The climb phase saw the aircraft rise by 20,704 feet in 12 minutes, covering a distance of 76 nautical miles. The enroute cruise phase was characterized by two distinct segments, with the aircraft maintaining a level altitude for a total of 5 minutes, covering 35 nautical miles. The descent phase began over the Chamonix hospital helipad, with the aircraft losing 15,974 feet in 10 minutes, covering 61 nautical miles. The final approach to Geneva Cointrin International Airport was initiated from the south west, with the aircraft aligning itself with runway 04.
The landing was executed with a threshold speed of 139 knots, and the aircraft touched down 221 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 131 knots. The touchdown rate was firm at -304 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. The total landing distance of 1,700 meters accounted for 48% of the available runway length. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance of 194 nautical miles was achieved in 39 minutes, with the aircraft consuming 1,825 kilograms of fuel.
The final approach to runway 04 at LSGG Geneva Cointrin International Airport was conducted from the south west, heading 45.0° at 4 nm and 1,313 ft agl. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height and threshold speed of 139 kt. The aircraft maintained a stable descent throughout the approach, with a slight deviation from the ideal touchdown zone, touching down 221 m beyond the designated area.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed was a little fast at 131 kt, resulting in a firm touchdown rate of -304 fpm. However, the runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating a high degree of control and precision during the landing. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 12 °C and a gentle headwind of 4 kt, contributed to a smooth and stable approach.
The total landing distance of 1,700 m, accounting for 48% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control and stability during the critical phases of the landing. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 96.3%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values