Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down before tight turns
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,660 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,660 m of the 3,350 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 756 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 91.6% indicates a strong performance with room for improvement in specific areas. Let's break down the analysis of each phase of the landing process.
In the Approach Phase, it is noted that the descent path was below the glideslope limit. This suggests that there was room for improvement in maintaining the correct descent angle to ensure a more stable approach to the runway. Focus on proper altitude awareness and adjustments to stay on the glideslope for smoother descents in future landings.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it is positive to see that the threshold height was good, indicating a proper alignment with the runway at the initial point of touchdown. However, the landing flare was described as very poor. This suggests that there was a lack of proper flare technique in smoothly transitioning from descent to touchdown. Practice and focus on executing a proper landing flare to improve overall touchdown quality.
In the Touchdown Phase, the touchdown rate was fair and the speed was on target, demonstrating good control during the final moments before touchdown. However, the touchdown point being 341m beyond the designated touchdown zone indicates the need for better spatial awareness and judgement of the touchdown point. Aim to improve accuracy in touchdown positioning to align with runway markers for safer landings.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 8.1m from the centerline suggests a slight deviation from the intended path during the rollout after touchdown. Pay attention to maintaining proper runway alignment throughout the entire landing process to ensure a smooth and controlled rollout to the taxiway.
Overall, this analysis provides valuable insights into areas for improvement in different phases of the landing process. Use this feedback as a learning opportunity to enhance your skills and strive for even better performance in future landings. Keep practicing and refining your techniques to achieve higher scores and elevate your overall landing proficiency. You are on the right track, and with dedication and focus, you can continue to improve and excel in your aircraft landings. Keep up the good work!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values