Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Be on speed by the gate
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 305 m and 152 m above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 305 m gate: speed 7 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 136 kt.
At the 152 m gate: speed 9 kt SLOW on the reference speed of 136 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 2,081 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,081 m of the 3,984 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 888 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Rostock-Laage Airport, the Airbus A320 began its journey on runway 27, taking off with a distance of 1,639 meters, which accounted for 65% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 158 knots, with a local temperature of 19 degrees Celsius and a gentle headwind of 4 knots. As the aircraft departed the airport, it entered a climb phase, starting approximately one mile east of Hohen Sprenz, Germany. The climb from 335 meters above sea level to 11,178 meters above sea level, an increase of 10,843.7 meters, was achieved in 18 minutes and covered a distance of 121 nautical miles.
During the enroute phase, the aircraft underwent several level cruises and descents, with the first descent starting overhead Walternienburg, Germany, and the final descent initiated one mile southeast of Hohenpolding, Germany. The aircraft's altitude decreased from 11,215 meters above sea level to 823 meters above sea level, a decrease of 9,392.5 meters, in a total of 19 minutes and covering 237 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 26L at Munich Airport, with a heading of 263.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 371.9 meters above ground level. The landing was executed with a touchdown speed of 115 knots and a smooth touchdown rate of -0.7 meters per second.
The Airbus A320 landed on runway 26L, with a total landing distance of 1,997 meters, accounting for 50% of the runway. The touchdown point was 470 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area, taking 7 minutes and covering 2 nautical miles. The total flight distance was 366 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 53 minutes and a fuel consumption of 2,368 kilograms.
The final approach to runway 26L at EDDM Munich Airport was initiated from the east, heading 263.0° at 4 nm and 371.9 meters above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a threshold height of 22.8 meters above ground level, which was well above the target. The threshold speed of 127 knots was slightly below the target, but still within acceptable limits.
As the aircraft touched down 470 meters beyond the touchdown zone, the touchdown speed of 115 knots was good, and the touchdown rate of -0.7 meters per second was smooth. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.8 meters from the centreline, which may have contributed to the slightly misaligned runway rollout alignment of 11.6 meters from the centreline. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 21°C and a wind of 5 knots at 309°, resulted in a crosswind of 4 knots and a headwind of 3 knots.
The total landing distance of 1,997 meters was 50% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing distance. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 83.7%. While there were some minor deviations from the target, the pilot's skills and the aircraft's performance were sufficient to ensure a safe and controlled landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values