Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Shorten the long landing
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,435 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 1,435 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 864 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
While it may seem discouraging to see a landing score of 49.7%, it's important to remember that this is an opportunity for growth and improvement. By breaking down the assessment into different phases, we can identify areas that need attention and focus on making adjustments for future landings.
In the Approach Phase, it's evident that there were issues with descent path, heading alignment, and speed control. These are crucial components of a successful landing and should be prioritized in practice sessions. By honing in on these skills, you can improve your approach and set yourself up for a smoother landing.
Moving onto the Landing Phase, it's clear that there were challenges with threshold height, landing flare, and heading upon touchdown. Working on your technique and coordination during this phase will be key in achieving a more precise and controlled landing.
In the Touchdown Phase, the assessment noted that the touchdown rate was good, but other aspects such as speed, touchdown point, and runway alignment were not up to par. By focusing on reducing speed, improving precision in touchdown placement, and centering your landing on the runway, you can make significant progress in this phase.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was off center. This indicates a need for better control and alignment as you roll out after touchdown. Practicing maintaining a straight path down the runway will help with this aspect of your landings.
Overall, while the assessment highlights areas for improvement, it also provides valuable feedback for you to work on. With dedication, practice, and persistence, there is great potential for growth and improvement in your landings. Keep pushing yourself to refine your skills and strive for better outcomes in future assessments. You have the ability to make significant progress and excel in your landings with continued effort and focus.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values