Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Roll the wings level with aileron and hold bank within limits as you establish the climb.
What happened: Bank increased to 4.3° during the initial climb, and wings stayed over-banked at 3.2° into the next climb segment.
Watch for: Attitude indicator bank angle, aiming to keep it near wings-level
Arrival
Close the throttles earlier on final so you cross the threshold at 119 kt rather than carrying excess speed.
What happened: The aircraft crossed the threshold at 126 kt, 7 kt above the 119 kt target, and the nose was then only raised 1° in the flare, taking out little of the sink. Crossing the threshold fast like this usually carries extra energy into a flare that barely arrests the sink, and that combination usually ends in a firm touchdown.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 119 kt at the threshold.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,987 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 570 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with taxiing from the parking area to the runway, which took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 08 at Innsbruck Airport (LOWI), with a takeoff distance of 874 meters, which was 46% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 140 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 2°C, with a wind speed of 2 knots at a direction of 306°. This resulted in a crosswind of 1 knot and a tailwind of 1 knot. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting overhead Innsbruck, and climbed from an altitude of 2,993 feet above sea level to 23,989 feet above sea level, an increase of 20,995 feet, in 8 minutes and covering a distance of 41 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 2 miles south of Biberwier, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 9 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting overhead Heiterwang, and descended from 23,995 feet above sea level to 4,983 feet above sea level, a decrease of 19,012 feet, in 16 minutes and covering a distance of 83 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise started 1 mile south east of Taufkirchen, and lasted for 2 minutes, covering a distance of 5 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, starting 1 mile north of Inning am Holz, and descended from 5,011 feet above sea level to 2,838 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,173 feet, in 3 minutes and covering a distance of 7 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 26L at Munich Airport (EDDM) was made from the east, with a heading of 263.0°, at an altitude of 1,363 feet above ground level, and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 26L, which had a length of 3,987 meters. The threshold height was above the target, and the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 127 knots.
The touchdown point was 150 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 119 knots, which was fast. The touchdown rate was fair at -253 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 5°C, with a wind speed of 9 knots at a direction of 220°. This resulted in a crosswind of 6 knots and a headwind of 6 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,307 meters, which was 33% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 16.0 meters from the centreline. The taxiing to the parking area from the runway took 3 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 153 nautical miles, taking 40 minutes, and the aircraft used 554 kilograms of fuel.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed on runway 26L at EDDM Munich Airport, achieving an overall score of 85.0%. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 263.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,363 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft successfully touched down on the runway, but with a few notable deviations from the target parameters.
The threshold height at 69 feet agl was above the target, indicating that the aircraft was slightly higher than desired when reaching the runway threshold. Additionally, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 127 knots, suggesting that the aircraft was slightly faster than required when reaching the threshold. Despite these minor deviations, the aircraft successfully landed on the runway.
The touchdown point was 150 meters beyond the touchdown zone, indicating that the aircraft overshot the intended touchdown location. Furthermore, the touchdown speed of 119 knots was faster than the target speed, resulting in a touchdown rate of -253 feet per minute (fpm), which was considered fair. The runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was well-aligned with the runway during touchdown.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 5°C and a wind speed of 9 knots from 220°. The crosswind and headwind components were both 6 knots, resulting in a relatively calm wind environment. The total landing distance was 1,307 meters, which was 33% of the runway length. This indicates that the aircraft was able to stop within a reasonable distance after touchdown.
However, the runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 16.0 meters from the centerline, indicating that the aircraft deviated from the intended path during the rollout phase. This deviation may have been caused by a combination of factors, including the aircraft's speed, the runway's surface, and the pilot's control inputs. Overall, while the landing was successful, there were several areas for improvement that could be addressed in future flights.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values