Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.6 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on approach to be at 127 kt by the stabilisation gate, not just by the threshold.
What happened: The approach was too fast at the stabilisation gate, crossing the threshold at 128 kt against a VREF of 127 kt.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator against 127 kt at the stabilisation gate.
See Arrival Approach
There are several things that can go wrong during the flare, carrying too much speed over the threshold, starting the flare at the wrong height and inconsistent flight control inputs, all contribute to a poor flare resulting in a hard touchdown or a float down the runway.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 15 stages, 14 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed 34 kt FAST on the reference speed of 127 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,594 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,594 m of the 3,193 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 601 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing Nouadhibou International Airport (GQPP), the Boeing 737-600 began its journey with a smooth taxi to the runway, taking just 3 minutes to cover less than 1 nautical mile. As it rolled down runway 02, the aircraft accelerated to liftoff speed of 139 knots, clearing the ground at a distance of 802 meters, which was 33% of the runway's length. The local weather conditions were favorable, with a temperature of 24°C and a gentle headwind of 10 knots.
As the aircraft climbed away from Nouadhibou, it began its enroute climb, reaching an altitude of 40,750 feet in 40 minutes, covering a distance of 310 nautical miles. The climb was characterized by a steady increase in altitude, with the aircraft reaching a maximum rate of climb. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise, maintaining an altitude of 40,750 feet for 40 minutes as it covered a distance of 319 nautical miles. The cruise phase was followed by a descent, which began overhead Boro, Mali, and took the aircraft down to 3,306 feet in just 20 minutes, covering 138 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached Bamako, Mali, it entered a brief level cruise, lasting just 2 minutes, before beginning its final approach to runway 06 at Modibo Keita International Airport (GABS). The approach was characterized by a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 129 knots. The aircraft touched down 186 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 123 knots, which was slightly faster than ideal. However, the touchdown rate was good at -172 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect. Following a smooth rollout, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking just 1 minute to cover less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 780 nautical miles, and the aircraft used 4,861 kilograms of fuel during the journey, which took a total of 1 hour and 8 minutes.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 06 at GABS Modibo Keita International Airport with a satisfactory approach quality, characterized by a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 129 kt. The aircraft's descent was well-managed, with a touchdown speed of 123 kt, although slightly above the ideal range. The touchdown rate of -172 fpm was, however, within acceptable limits.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's centreline alignment was perfect, indicating a high degree of control and precision during the landing phase. The touchdown point was 186 m beyond the touchdown zone, which, while not ideal, did not compromise the overall safety of the operation. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 29 °C and a gentle headwind of 3 kt, contributed to a relatively smooth landing.
The total landing distance of 1,514 m, accounting for 47% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. The runway rollout alignment was very good, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control and stability during the critical phase of the landing. Overall, the landing was scored 97.7%, reflecting a high degree of proficiency and adherence to standard operating procedures.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values