Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Arrival
Begin the flare with progressive back pressure and keep it coming until the sink is arrested, rather than flying it on flat.
What happened: The nose was barely raised in the flare and little of the sink was taken out, flying the aircraft onto the runway. This pattern usually carries through to a firm touchdown with a noticeable sink rate.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smoothly reducing sink through the normal flare band, not a steady rate into the runway.
Start to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,779 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 282 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 16 at ENNA Lakselv Airport, Banak, with a takeoff distance of 642 meters, which was 25% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 134 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it encountered local weather conditions of -3°C temperature and a wind speed of 24 knots at 169 degrees. The crosswind was 2 knots, while the headwind was 24 knots. The enroute climb started overhead Lakselv, Troms og Finnmark, Norway, and reached an altitude of 39,995 feet above sea level, an increase of 38,975 feet in 16 minutes, covering 96 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered a level cruise, starting 7 miles south of Olderdalen, Troms og Finnmark, Norway, and lasted for 9 minutes, covering 74 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 6 miles southwest of Sjovegan, Troms og Finnmark, Norway, and descended from 40,005 feet to 11,021 feet above sea level, a decrease of 28,984 feet in 7 minutes, covering 49 nautical miles.
The aircraft continued to alternate between level cruise and descent phases, with each phase lasting for a few minutes and covering a short distance. The final level cruise started 6 miles southwest of ENBO Bodø Airport, Bodø, Nordland Fylke, Norway, and lasted for 6 minutes, covering 3 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 07 at ENBO Bodø Airport was made from the west, heading 78.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,051 feet above ground level. The landing on runway 07 was successful, with a touchdown distance of 282 meters, which was 21% of the runway length. The touchdown speed was a little fast at 110 knots, but the touchdown rate was firm at -316 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 0°C temperature and a wind speed of 23 knots at 100 degrees. The crosswind was 9 knots, while the headwind was 21 knots. The total landing distance was 582 meters, and the runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 300 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 68 minutes. The aircraft used 960 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed at ENBO Bodø Airport, achieving a high score of 97.8%. The final approach was conducted from the west, heading 78.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,051 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft then landed on runway 07, which has a length of 2,779 meters.
The landing was characterized by a good threshold height, indicating that the aircraft was properly configured for landing. The threshold speed of 116 knots was also within acceptable limits. However, the touchdown speed of 110 knots was slightly faster than desired, which may have resulted in a firmer touchdown rate.
The touchdown rate of -316 feet per minute (fpm) was firm, but this is not necessarily a cause for concern, as it is within the acceptable range for a safe landing. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline at the moment of touchdown.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were cold, with a temperature of 0°C, and windy, with a wind speed of 23 knots from a direction of 100°. The crosswind component was 9 knots, while the headwind component was 21 knots. Despite these challenging conditions, the aircraft performed well, with a total landing distance of 582 meters, which is only 21% of the runway length.
The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was properly controlled during the rollout phase of the landing. Overall, the landing was successful, and the aircraft performed well in challenging weather conditions.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values