Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Rotate sooner, bringing the nose up at 155 kt rather than letting speed build further.
What happened: You lifted off at 173 kt against a rotation target of 155 kt, rotating late in the ground roll.
Watch for: Watch airspeed and rotate at the target of 155 kt.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Begin the flare with progressive back pressure and keep it coming until the sink is arrested, rather than flying it on flat.
What happened: The nose was barely raised in the flare and little of the sink was taken out, flying the aircraft onto the runway. This pattern usually carries through to a firm touchdown with a noticeable sink rate.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: a smoothly reducing sink through the normal flare band, not a steady rate into the runway.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,790 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 268 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, the Airbus A320 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. As the aircraft lined up on runway 01L, the local weather conditions were characterized by a temperature of 13 °C and a wind speed of 15 knots from a direction of 360°, resulting in a 15-knot headwind and a negligible crosswind.
After a successful departure roll, the aircraft initiated its enroute climb, ascending from 1,770 feet above sea level to 32,629 feet in 23 minutes, covering a distance of 176 nautical miles. The climb was characterized by a significant increase in altitude, with a total ascent of 30,859 feet. The aircraft then transitioned into a level cruise, first at an altitude of 32,629 feet, and later at 33,008 feet, before beginning its descent towards Copenhagen Kastrup Airport. The descent phase was notable for its steepness, with a decrease in altitude of 29,196 feet in 20 minutes, covering a distance of 132 nautical miles.
Upon reaching the vicinity of Hoekoepinge, the aircraft initiated its final descent, touching down on runway 30 at Copenhagen Kastrup Airport. The landing was characterized by a slightly misaligned runway touchdown position and a heavy touchdown rate of -676 feet per minute. The aircraft's total landing distance was 1,168 meters, accounting for 56% of the runway length. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 415 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 80 minutes and a fuel consumption of 3,509 kilograms.
The final approach to runway 30 at EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport from the south east was executed with a heading of 303.0° at 4 nm and 1,062 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height achieved. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 144 kt, indicating a slight deviation from the optimal landing conditions.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, the touchdown distance was good at 276 m, but the touchdown speed of 143 kt was a little fast. This resulted in a heavy touchdown rate of -676 fpm, which may have caused some discomfort for the passengers. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.8 m from the centreline, which could have been due to the crosswind component of 16 kt. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 11 °C and a wind speed of 40 kt at 280°, may have contributed to the slight deviations from the optimal landing conditions.
The total landing distance of 1,168 m was 56% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 10.1 m from the centreline, indicating a slight deviation from the optimal alignment. Despite these minor deviations, the overall landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 93.7%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values