Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,594 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 752 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, the Boeing 737-600 began its journey on runway 18L, taking off with a distance of 864 meters, which accounted for 31% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 142 knots, with a gentle headwind of 2 knots and a calm crosswind. As it departed the Netherlands, the aircraft encountered a temperature of 12 degrees Celsius and a light wind of 2 knots from the east.
As the aircraft climbed to its cruising altitude, it began its enroute climb 1 mile northeast of Aalsmeerderbrug, increasing its altitude from 1,017 feet to 36,988 feet in 23 minutes, covering a distance of 140 nautical miles. The climb was a steady and efficient ascent, allowing the aircraft to reach its cruising altitude in a relatively short period. Following the climb, the aircraft entered a 34-minute level cruise, covering 253 nautical miles at a steady altitude. This phase of the flight was characterized by a stable and efficient cruise, with the aircraft maintaining a consistent speed and altitude.
As the aircraft approached its destination, Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, it began its enroute descent 2 miles south of Grimstad, Norway. The descent was a gradual and controlled process, with the aircraft decreasing its altitude from 36,504 feet to 1,949 feet in 24 minutes, covering a distance of 159 nautical miles. The final approach to runway 19R was made from the north, with the aircraft aligning itself with the runway at 4 nautical miles and 1,265 feet above ground level. The landing was smooth and controlled, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 121 knots and a rate of -165 feet per minute. The total landing distance was 1,204 meters, which accounted for 34% of the runway. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, taking 1 minute to cover a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 559 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 1 hour and 29 minutes, and a fuel consumption of 3,592 kilograms.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 19R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a satisfactory approach quality. The aircraft descended from 1,265 feet above ground level (agl) at a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway threshold, aligning with the runway heading of 196.0°. The threshold height was good, allowing for a smooth transition to the landing phase.
The aircraft touched down 330 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a speed of 121 knots. The touchdown rate of -165 feet per minute was within acceptable limits, indicating a controlled descent. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centreline by 5.8 meters. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 1°C and a headwind of 4 knots, contributed to a relatively stable approach.
The total landing distance of 1,204 meters was 34% of the runway length, indicating a reasonable use of the available runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good, with the aircraft maintaining a consistent path along the centreline. Overall, the landing performance scored 94.1%, reflecting a high level of proficiency in executing the landing phase.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values