Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Hold the approach angle
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,431 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 585 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 91.3% is a solid performance, but there are definitely areas where improvement can be made to achieve an even higher score in the future.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it's noted that the descent path was above the glideslope limit. This indicates that the aircraft may have been descending too steeply or too shallowly, resulting in a less than optimal approach. It's important for pilots to focus on maintaining a stable descent path to ensure a smooth and safe landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, the threshold height was above target and the landing flare was very poor. These are critical components of a successful landing, as hitting the touchdown zone at the correct height and executing a proper flare are essential for a smooth touchdown. It's crucial for pilots to work on these aspects to improve their overall landing performance.
In the Touchdown Phase, it's positive to see that the touchdown rate was good and the speed was on target. However, the touchdown point being 168 m beyond the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 2.7 m from the centerline indicate room for improvement in terms of accuracy and precision during the landing phase.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment was noted to be very good. This is a key factor in ensuring a safe and efficient landing, as proper runway alignment is essential for a smooth rollout and taxiing after touchdown.
Overall, while there are areas that need improvement, such as the descent path, threshold height, landing flare, and touchdown accuracy, there were also positive aspects such as touchdown rate, speed control, and runway alignment. With a focus on practicing and refining these skills, pilots can work towards achieving even higher landing scores in the future. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of the landing process.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values