Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,210 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 558 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 85.6% is quite impressive, but there are definitely some areas that could use improvement. Let's break down the different phases of the landing and see where we can make adjustments for even better performance.
Starting with the Approach Phase, it's great to note that the glideslope alignment was good. This shows excellent precision and control in the descent towards the runway. Keep up the good work in maintaining this aspect of the approach.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, there are a couple of areas that could use some focus. Firstly, the threshold height being above target is something to pay attention to, as it may impact the overall smoothness of the landing. Additionally, the very poor landing flare indicates that there may have been some room for improvement in the approach to the touchdown. Working on these areas can help in achieving a smoother touchdown and overall better landing experience.
In the Touchdown Phase, it's important to note that the touchdown rate was hard. This can put unnecessary stress on the aircraft and passengers, so aiming for a softer touchdown is advisable. On a positive note, the speed was on target, which shows good control and adherence to safety protocols. However, the touchdown point being 144 m beyond the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 3.7 m from the centreline suggest that adjustments in alignment and positioning are needed for future landings.
Lastly, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 13.5 m from the centreline indicates the need for improved alignment control during the landing rollout. Keeping the aircraft aligned with the runway centreline is crucial for a smooth and safe rollout.
Overall, this landing score of 85.6% is a commendable achievement, but there are clear areas for improvement. By focusing on elements such as flare technique, touchdown smoothness, alignment, and positioning, you can enhance your landing performance and strive for even higher scores in the future. Keep practicing and refining your skills, and you'll surely see progress in your aircraft landings. Keep up the great work!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values