Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,926 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 409 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking area to the runway, which took approximately 2 minutes and covered less than 1 nautical mile. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-600, then departed from runway 17 at MMIO Plan De Guadalupe International Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,300 meters, which is 45% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 142 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 20°C, with a wind speed of 4 knots at a direction of 70°. The crosswind component was 4 knots, while the tailwind component was 1 knot. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 2 miles southeast of Ramos Arizpe, Mexico. The climb took 34 minutes and covered a distance of 263 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from an altitude of 5,881 feet above sea level to 38,306 feet above sea level, an increase of 32,425 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 3 miles south of Teocaltiche, Mexico. This phase lasted for 252 minutes and covered a distance of 2,695 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting at a latitude of -23.3215043 and a longitude of -108.4011372. The descent took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 236 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from an altitude of 38,244 feet above sea level to 1,195 feet above sea level, a decrease of 37,049 feet.
The final approach to runway 10 at SCIP Mataveri Airport was made from the northwest, with a heading of 118.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,006 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 10, which has a length of 2,926 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was well above the target speed at 124 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 411 meters, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 113 knots. The touchdown rate was perfect at -13 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was perfect.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 21°C, with a wind speed of 5 knots at a direction of 109°. The crosswind component was 1 knot, while the headwind component was 5 knots. The total landing distance was 792 meters, which is 27% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was perfect. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking area took approximately 1 minute and covered less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 3,201 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 302 minutes. The aircraft used a total of 16,493 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-600 aircraft successfully landed at SCIP Mataveri Airport, achieving a high score of 99.8%. The final approach to runway 10 was conducted from the north-west, with a heading of 118.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,006 feet above ground level.
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a speed of 124 knots, which was significantly above the target threshold speed. However, this did not affect the overall performance of the landing. The touchdown distance of 411 meters was considered good, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain a stable approach and touchdown.
Despite the high touchdown speed of 113 knots, the touchdown rate of -13 feet per minute was perfect, demonstrating excellent control and stability during the landing. The runway touchdown alignment was also perfect, indicating that the aircraft was aligned with the centerline of the runway at the moment of touchdown.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 21°C and a wind speed of 5 knots from a direction of 109°. The crosswind component was minimal at 1 knot, while the headwind component was 5 knots, which helped to stabilize the aircraft during the approach.
The total landing distance of 792 meters was only 27% of the runway length, indicating that the aircraft was able to stop quickly and efficiently after touchdown. The runway rollout alignment was also perfect, demonstrating excellent control and stability during the rollout phase of the landing.
Overall, the landing was considered a success, with the aircraft achieving a high score and demonstrating excellent control and stability throughout the approach, touchdown, and rollout phases.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values