Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 5.4 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: no landing flap set.
At the 500 ft gate: off the centreline.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 1,962 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 475 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 13 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Cessna C172, then departed from runway 24 at EDLW Dortmund Airport. The takeoff distance was 282 meters, which is 20% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was 66 knots.
As the aircraft climbed out of EDLW Dortmund Airport, it reached an altitude of 7,829 feet above sea level, increasing from an initial altitude of 1,450 feet. This climb took 11 minutes and covered a distance of 13 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, starting 3 miles north of Werne, Germany. It descended from 7,788 feet to 5,223 feet, a decrease of 2,566 feet, in 5 minutes and covered a distance of 9 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, starting overhead Sendenhorst, Germany, and lasted for 9 minutes, covering a distance of 17 nautical miles. The next descent phase started 1 mile east of Glandorf, Germany, and the aircraft descended from 5,196 feet to 2,982 feet, a decrease of 2,214 feet, in 3 minutes and covered a distance of 5 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, starting overhead Bad Iburg, Germany, and lasted for 3 minutes, covering a distance of 3 nautical miles. The next descent phase started overhead Hagen, Germany, and the aircraft descended from 3,064 feet to 1,470 feet, a decrease of 1,594 feet, in 4 minutes and covered a distance of 6 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 25 at EDDG Münster Osnabrück Airport was made from the east, heading 255.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,307 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with a touchdown distance of 471 meters and a touchdown speed of 46 knots. The touchdown rate was perfect at -44 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.9 meters from the centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 9 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 1 knot at 296 degrees. There was no crosswind or headwind. The aircraft then taxied to the parking from the runway, which took 4 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 61 nautical miles, taking 49 minutes, and the aircraft used 18 kilograms of fuel.
The Cessna C172 aircraft successfully landed on runway 25 at EDDG Münster Osnabrück Airport, achieving an overall score of 86.7%. The final approach was initiated from the east, heading 255.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,307 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft's performance during the landing was satisfactory, with a touchdown distance of 471 meters, which is considered good. The touchdown speed of 46 knots was also within the acceptable range, indicating a smooth and controlled descent. Furthermore, the touchdown rate of -44 feet per minute (fpm) was perfect, demonstrating precise control over the aircraft's descent.
However, there were some minor issues during the landing. The threshold height at 65 feet agl was above the target, suggesting that the aircraft may have been slightly high on final approach. Additionally, the threshold speed of 71 knots was well above the target, indicating that the pilot may have been applying too much power or not enough drag during the approach.
The runway touchdown position was also slightly misaligned by 5.9 meters from the centreline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the aircraft's heading or a miscalculation of the approach path. Despite these minor issues, the overall performance of the aircraft during the landing was satisfactory, and the pilot demonstrated good control and precision.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 9°C and a wind speed of 1 knot from 296°. The crosswind and headwind components were both zero, which made the landing conditions ideal. Overall, the Cessna C172 aircraft performed well during the landing, and the pilot demonstrated good skills and control.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values