Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
See Departure Roll
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 2,171 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,171 m of the 3,216 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 591 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 11 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft then departed from runway 28 at Nuremberg Airport (EDDN), with a takeoff distance of 867 meters, which accounted for 32% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 134 knots.
As the aircraft took off, it encountered local weather conditions of 27°C temperature and a wind speed of 4 knots at 112 degrees. The crosswind was 1 knot, while the tailwind was 4 knots. After departing from Nuremberg Airport, the aircraft began its enroute climb, which started overhead the airport and reached an altitude of 34,120 feet above sea level. The climb was a significant increase of 32,098 feet in just 18 minutes, covering a distance of 102 nautical miles.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 1 mile southwest of Griefstedt, Germany. This phase lasted for 21 minutes and covered a distance of 74 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, which started 1 mile northwest of Grafhorst, Germany. The descent was a decrease of 23,108 feet in just 10 minutes, covering a distance of 71 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 1 mile north of Alt Moelln, Germany. This phase was relatively short, lasting only 3 minutes and covering a distance of 19 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final descent, which started overhead Bebensee, Germany. The descent was a decrease of 9,748 feet in 15 minutes, covering a distance of 16 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 15 at Hamburg Helmut Schmidt Airport (EDDH) was from the northwest, with a heading of 153.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,279 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with a touchdown point 173 meters beyond the touchdown zone. The touchdown speed was 126 knots, which was slightly fast, but the touchdown rate was good at -150 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 25°C temperature and a wind speed of 9 knots at 140 degrees. The crosswind was 2 knots, while the headwind was 9 knots. The total landing distance was 2,088 meters, which accounted for 65% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was also very good. After landing, the aircraft took 3 minutes to taxi to the parking, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 291 nautical miles, which was covered in 69 minutes. The aircraft used 1,280 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed at EDDH Hamburg Helmut Schmidt Airport, achieving a score of 97.2%. The final approach was conducted from the north-west, heading 153.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,279 feet above ground level (agl). The aircraft landed on runway 15, which has a length of 3,216 meters.
The threshold height was reported as good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct height as it approached the runway. However, the threshold speed was above the target speed, reaching 136 knots. This may indicate that the aircraft was slightly overpowered or that the pilot was taking a more cautious approach.
The touchdown point was 173 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The touchdown speed of 126 knots was faster than the target speed, which may have contributed to the slightly longer landing distance. The touchdown rate of -150 feet per minute (fpm) was good, indicating that the aircraft was able to touch down smoothly and maintain control.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were favorable, with a temperature of 25°C and a wind speed of 9 knots from 140°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 9 knots, which helped to reduce the landing distance.
The total landing distance was 2,088 meters, which is 65% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to touch down and stop within a reasonable distance. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain control and direction during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the aircraft was able to touch down smoothly and maintain control throughout the rollout phase. The score of 97.2% reflects the high level of proficiency demonstrated by the pilot and the aircraft.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values