Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow the descent speed
Below 10,000 ft you are typically limited to 250 kt indicated (a US rule that much of the world mirrors in some form, though not universally). This forces a deceleration around 10,000 ft whether the profile wants one or not, so plan for it rather than discovering it.
Read more in Descent PlanningStart to finish · 23 stages, 21 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,594 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 392 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 7 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The aircraft, an Airbus A321, then departed from runway 17 at ENBR Bergen Airport, Flesland. The takeoff distance was 742 meters, which accounted for 30% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 143 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 16 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 39 knots at 144 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 17 knots and a headwind of 35 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, which started overhead ENBR Bergen Airport, Flesland. The climb took 14 minutes and covered a distance of 70 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from 1,162 feet above sea level to 30,262 feet above sea level, an increase of 29,100 feet.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which lasted for 2 minutes and covered a distance of 12 nautical miles. This phase took place 19 miles south east of Eidfjord, Norway. The aircraft then began its enroute descent, which started 14 miles south of Geilo, Norway. The descent took 18 minutes and covered a distance of 91 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 29,981 feet above sea level to 1,931 feet above sea level, a decrease of 28,050 feet.
The final approach to runway 19R at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen was made from the north, heading 196.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,249 feet above ground level. However, the aircraft was required to perform a go-around at 160 feet above ground level. The aircraft then landed on runway 19R, which had a length of 3,594 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was well above the target at 143 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 393 meters, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 139 knots. The touchdown rate was fair at -255 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 4.2 meters from the centreline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 13 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 21 knots at 181 degrees. This resulted in a crosswind of 5 knots and a headwind of 21 knots. The total landing distance was 1,286 meters, which accounted for 36% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 8 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 189 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 67 minutes. The aircraft used 3,146 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Airbus A321 successfully landed at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a score of 95.2%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north, heading 196.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,249 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was made to runway 19R, which has a length of 3,594 meters.
The landing was executed with good threshold height, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct altitude as it touched down on the runway. However, the threshold speed was above the target speed, coming in at 143 knots. This may have been due to the aircraft's descent rate or the pilot's decision to maintain a higher speed for the landing.
The touchdown distance was within acceptable limits, measuring 393 meters. However, the touchdown speed was slightly faster than desired, at 139 knots. This may have resulted in a slightly higher touchdown rate, which was measured at -255 feet per minute (fpm). While this is not ideal, it is still within the acceptable range.
The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned from the centerline, by 4.2 meters. This may have been due to the crosswind or the pilot's judgment during the landing. The local weather conditions at the time of the landing included a temperature of 13°C and a wind speed of 21 knots from 181°. The crosswind component was minimal, at 5 knots, while the headwind component was 21 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,286 meters, which is 36% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was well-controlled during the landing. The runway rollout alignment was very good, showing that the pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, with the aircraft touching down safely on the runway. While there were some minor issues with the touchdown speed and runway alignment, the pilot's overall performance was good, and the aircraft scored a high 95.2%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values