Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.6 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed below the reference speed.
At the 500 ft gate: speed below the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,043 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 434 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 16 minutes and covered a distance of 4 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 18 at Frankfurt Airport (EDDF). The takeoff distance was 1,431 meters, which accounted for 36% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 156 knots.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it encountered local weather conditions with a temperature of 4°C and winds of 8 knots at 30°. The crosswind was 4 knots, while the tailwind was 7 knots. The enroute climb began 2 miles west of Moerfelden-Walldorf, a town in the state of Hessen, Germany. The aircraft climbed from an altitude of 1,385 feet above sea level to 39,334 feet, an increase of 37,949 feet, in 21 minutes and covering a distance of 134 nautical miles.
Following the climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 1 mile south east of Augsburg Airport (EDMA) in the state of Bavaria, Germany. This phase lasted for 47 minutes and covered a distance of 348 nautical miles. The enroute descent began 1 mile north of Ascoli Piceno, a town in the Marche region of Italy. The aircraft descended from an altitude of 39,348 feet to 1,588 feet, a decrease of 37,760 feet, in 33 minutes and covering a distance of 122 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 24 at Naples International Airport (LIRN) was made from the north east, with a heading of 237.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,280 feet above ground level. The landing was successful, with a touchdown speed of 122 knots and a touchdown rate of -33 feet per minute. The touchdown distance was 434 meters, which was within the acceptable limits. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.5 meters from the centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were a temperature of 2°C and winds of 8 knots at 29°. The crosswind was 4 knots, while the tailwind was 7 knots. The total landing distance was 1,075 meters, which accounted for 53% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, indicating a smooth and controlled landing. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 3 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
In total, the flight covered a distance of 614 nautical miles and lasted for 118 minutes. The aircraft used 4,341 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at LIRN Naples International Airport, achieving a high score of 99.2%. The final approach to runway 24 was conducted from the north-east, with a heading of 237.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,280 feet above ground level.
The aircraft touched down on the runway with a good threshold height, and the threshold speed was also satisfactory at 133 knots. The touchdown distance was within acceptable limits at 434 meters, and the touchdown speed was maintained at 122 knots, which is a good indicator of the pilot's control and precision during the landing. The touchdown rate was perfect, with a rate of -33 feet per minute, demonstrating the pilot's ability to smoothly and safely bring the aircraft to the ground.
However, there was a slight deviation in the runway touchdown position, with the aircraft landing 3.5 meters off the centerline. This minor discrepancy may be attributed to various factors, including wind conditions or pilot error. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 2°C and winds of 8 knots at 29°, resulting in a crosswind of 4 knots and a tailwind of 7 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,075 meters, which is 53% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot was able to bring the aircraft to a stop quickly and efficiently. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, demonstrating the pilot's ability to maintain control and stability during the landing and rollout phases.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the pilot demonstrated good control and precision throughout the approach and landing phases. However, the slight deviation in the runway touchdown position and the relatively short landing distance may be areas for improvement in future landings.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values