Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Be on speed by the gate
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 305 m and 152 m above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 305 m gate: speed 35 kt FAST on the reference speed of 152 kt.
At the 152 m gate: sink rate 6.0 m/s, more than the glideslope needed and speed 27 kt FAST on the reference speed of 152 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,989 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,989 m of the 3,984 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 897 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Munich Airport's runway 26L, the Airbus A330-900 began its takeoff roll, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 176 kt in 3,267 meters, 82% of the available runway length. The aircraft then transitioned into a steady climb, ascending from 728 meters above sea level to 3,041 meters in just 5 minutes, covering a distance of 22 nautical miles. This initial climb phase was characterized by a significant rate of ascent, with an increase of 2,313.2 meters in altitude.
As the aircraft continued on its journey, it entered a level cruise phase, maintaining an altitude of 3,017 meters for 3 minutes while covering 12 nautical miles. However, this stability was short-lived, as the aircraft began its descent from 3,017 meters to 1,533 meters in 5 minutes, covering 23 nautical miles. This descent phase was followed by another level cruise phase, this time lasting only 3 minutes, before the aircraft began its final descent from 1,524 meters to 826 meters in 3 minutes, covering 10 nautical miles. The aircraft then lined up for its final approach to runway 26L, touching down 497 meters beyond the touchdown zone at a speed of 155 kt, with a firm touchdown rate of -1.7 meters per second.
The landing distance of 1,924 meters, 48% of the available runway length, was slightly above the target, while the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 11.0 meters from the centerline. The aircraft then taxied to the parking area, taking 6 minutes to cover a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance of 76 nautical miles was completed in 27 minutes, with the aircraft consuming 2,217 kilograms of fuel.
The aircraft touched down on runway 26L at EDDM Munich Airport, a 3,990-meter-long runway, after a final approach from the east. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height achieved. However, the threshold speed was above the target, reaching 165 knots. This may have been due to the aircraft's descent rate, which was not explicitly mentioned in the report.
The touchdown point was located 497 meters beyond the touchdown zone, indicating a slightly long touchdown. The touchdown speed of 155 knots was also a little fast, which may have contributed to the firm touchdown rate of -1.7 meters per second. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 11 meters from the centreline, which could have been due to a slight deviation in the approach path. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 14 degrees Celsius and a light wind of 4 knots from 9 degrees, were not particularly challenging.
The total landing distance of 1,924 meters was 48% of the runway length, which is within the acceptable range. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 10.8 meters from the centreline, indicating a slight deviation in the aircraft's direction during the rollout phase. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 85.8%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values