Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Maintain the centreline
See Departure Roll
A small uncorrected heading error at 40 knots becomes a metre of offset per second by 100 knots, noticed only at rotation, producing a crabbed liftoff. Root cause is nearly always eyes on the tape instead of the far end of the runway. Small heading changes displace a distant point visibly long before the nearby centreline stripes look wrong.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,441 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 477 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. The Airbus A320 then departed from runway 19L at ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, with a takeoff distance of 1,122 meters, which accounted for 38% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 160 knots, and the local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 11 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 16 knots from a direction of 180 degrees.
The crosswind component was 5 knots, while the headwind component was 16 knots. As the aircraft took off, it began its enroute climb, which started approximately 1 mile south east of ENGM Oslo Airport, Gardermoen. The climb took the aircraft from an altitude of 1,731 feet above sea level to 26,631 feet above sea level, an increase of 24,900 feet, in 18 minutes and covering a distance of 102 nautical miles.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which began 22 miles south east of Eidfjord, Norway. This phase lasted for 2 minutes and covered a distance of 13 nautical miles. The enroute descent phase started 14 miles south of Eidfjord and took the aircraft from an altitude of 26,773 feet above sea level to 1,447 feet above sea level, a decrease of 25,327 feet, in 14 minutes and covering a distance of 59 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 17 at ENBR Bergen Airport, Flesland, was made from the north, with the aircraft heading 171.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,280 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 17, which had a length of 2,441 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also satisfactory at 133 knots.
The touchdown point was 52 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 128 knots, which was slightly faster than desired. However, the touchdown rate was fair at -228 feet per minute, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 12 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 23 knots from a direction of 190 degrees.
The crosswind component was 8 knots, while the headwind component was 22 knots. The total landing distance was 1,076 meters, which accounted for 44% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, and the aircraft was able to taxi to the parking area from the runway in just 2 minutes, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 182 nautical miles, and the flight used 2,135 kilograms of fuel.
The Airbus A320 successfully landed at ENBR Bergen Airport, Flesland, with a score of 99.0%. The aircraft approached the runway from the north, heading 171.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,280 feet above ground level (agl). The final approach was executed with good control, and the aircraft touched down on runway 17, which has a length of 2,441 meters.
The threshold height was satisfactory, and the threshold speed was maintained at 133 knots, indicating a well-executed approach. However, the touchdown point was 52 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight deviation from the intended landing spot. The touchdown speed of 128 knots was slightly faster than desired, but the touchdown rate of -228 feet per minute (fpm) was considered fair.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 12°C and a wind speed of 23 knots from 190°. This resulted in a crosswind of 8 knots and a headwind of 22 knots, which the pilots effectively managed during the landing. The total landing distance of 1,076 meters was 44% of the runway length, indicating a relatively short landing roll.
The runway rollout alignment was perfect, demonstrating the pilots' ability to maintain control and stability during the landing roll. Overall, the landing was executed with a high degree of precision and control, resulting in a score of 99.0%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values