Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 7.8 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on approach to be at 128 kt by the stabilisation gate, not just by the threshold.
What happened: The approach was too fast at the stabilisation gate, crossing the threshold at 125 kt against a VREF of 128 kt.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator against 128 kt at the stabilisation gate.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 15 stages, 13 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 500 ft gate: speed 20 kt FAST on the reference speed of 128 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,494 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 476 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from EKVG Vágar Airport, the Boeing 737-600 began its journey with a taxiing period of 5 minutes, covering a distance of 1 nautical mile to reach the runway. The departure roll commenced on runway 30, with the aircraft taking off in a distance of 800 meters, utilizing 45% of the runway. The liftoff speed was achieved at 140 knots, as the aircraft transitioned from the ground to the air.
As the aircraft climbed to its cruising altitude, it encountered a local weather condition of 12°C temperature and a wind speed of 5 knots from 239°. The enroute climb phase started overhead Sorvagur, Faroe Islands, where the aircraft ascended from 1,106 feet above sea level to 38,996 feet, an increase of 37,890 feet in 42 minutes, covering a distance of 345 nautical miles. Following this, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, lasting 135 minutes, covering 1,109 nautical miles, and positioning itself 96 miles southeast of EGPB Sumburgh Airport, Lerwick, Scotland. The enroute descent phase commenced 2 miles north of Kamenica, Central Serbia, where the aircraft descended from 38,941 feet to 3,202 feet, a decrease of 35,739 feet in 21 minutes, covering 144 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 35 at BKPR Priština Adem Jashari International Airport was conducted from the south, with the aircraft maintaining a heading of 354.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,411 feet above ground level. The landing was executed on a runway length of 2,494 meters, with a threshold speed of 126 knots and a touchdown speed of 117 knots. The touchdown point was 62 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown rate of -195 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.6 meters from the centerline. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area in 1 minute, covering less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 1,605 nautical miles, taking 207 minutes, and utilizing 8,849 kilograms of fuel.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 35 at BKPR Priština Adem Jashari International Airport with a good threshold height, allowing the crew to maintain a stable approach. The threshold speed of 126 kt was also well-managed, indicating a high degree of control and precision. As the aircraft made contact with the runway, the touchdown speed of 117 kt was within acceptable limits, and the touchdown rate of -195 fpm was also satisfactory.
The touchdown point was located 62 m beyond the touchdown zone, which, although not ideal, did not compromise the overall safety of the landing. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.6 m from the centreline, but this deviation was minor and did not affect the aircraft's ability to maintain control during the rollout phase. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 26 °C and a gentle wind of 6 kt at 30 °, contributed to a relatively straightforward landing.
The total landing distance of 1,096 m, which accounted for 44% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. The runway rollout alignment was very good, demonstrating the crew's ability to maintain control and stability during the critical phase of the landing. Overall, the landing was scored 98.1%, reflecting a high degree of proficiency and control.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values