Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Raise the gear lever promptly once a positive climb is confirmed, before reaching the target retraction height.
What happened: Gear retraction was delayed, with the gear not coming up until 880 ft agl.
Watch for: Landing gear: up by the normal retraction gate
Arrival
Use small rudder inputs against a point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline during rollout.
What happened: During the rollout the aircraft drifted 5.2 m off the centreline.
Watch for: Runway centreline marks: hold the aircraft tracking straight down the centreline through rollout
See Arrival Rollout
Make sure that you retract the landing gear once you have a positive rate of climb and there is no usable runway left to land back on.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 21 stages, 19 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 2,019 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 2,019 m of the 3,526 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 522 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight departed from Faro Airport (LPFR) in Portugal, where the Boeing 737-800 began its taxiing process, taking approximately 5 minutes to reach the runway. With a local temperature of 22 °C and a gentle headwind of 0 kt, the aircraft took off from runway 28, covering a distance of 1,381 meters, which accounted for 57% of the runway length. The liftoff speed was achieved at 154 kt, marking the beginning of the enroute climb phase.
As the aircraft ascended from 1,003 feet above sea level to 35,112 feet, it covered a distance of 94 nautical miles in 18 minutes, demonstrating a steady climb rate. The enroute level cruise phase commenced 2 miles southwest of Évora Airfield (LPEV) in Portugal, where the aircraft maintained a steady altitude for 123 minutes, covering 884 nautical miles. The flight then entered a series of enroute descents, gradually reducing altitude as it approached its destination. The final approach to runway 18R at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (EHAM) was initiated from the north, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 127 kt, slightly above the recommended threshold speed of 135 kt.
The landing distance of 1,934 meters, accounting for 55% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. The runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned, but the runway rollout alignment was perfect. The total flight distance of 1,126 nautical miles was achieved in 189 minutes, with the aircraft consuming 7,669 kilograms of fuel. The flight concluded with the aircraft taxiing to the parking area, taking approximately 12 minutes to cover a distance of 4 nautical miles.
The Boeing 737-800 touched down on runway 18R at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol with a satisfactory approach quality, despite a slight deviation from the ideal touchdown zone. The aircraft descended from an altitude of 1,272 feet above ground level (agl) at a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway threshold, heading 183.0°. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed of 135 knots was well within the acceptable range.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed of 127 knots was a little fast, but the touchdown rate of -170 feet per minute (fpm) was good. However, the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 3.3 meters from the centreline. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 20°C and a light headwind of 2 knots, contributed to a relatively smooth landing. The crosswind component was minimal, at 2 knots.
The total landing distance of 1,934 meters, which accounted for 55% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, with the aircraft maintaining a straight course along the centreline. Overall, the landing performance was satisfactory, with a score of 99.1%.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values