Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Slow down before tight turns
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,850 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,850 m of the 2,652 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 554 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 96.2% is quite impressive, indicating a solid performance during the various phases of the landing process.
During the Approach Phase, the excellent glideslope alignment suggests that the pilot did a great job of maintaining the proper descent angle, ensuring a smooth and controlled approach to the runway. This is a crucial aspect of the landing process and a key factor in achieving a successful touchdown.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, while the threshold height was slightly above target, the good landing flare shows that the pilot successfully flared the aircraft just before touchdown, reducing the risk of a hard landing. This demonstrates skill and precision in executing the landing maneuver.
In the Touchdown Phase, it is noted that the touchdown rate was firm and the speed was a little above target. While a firm touchdown is generally not ideal, it is important to ensure the aircraft makes solid contact with the runway. Additionally, the touchdown point being slightly beyond the designated zone shows room for improvement in aiming for a more precise touchdown location.
The runway touchdown position being 6.1 m from the centerline indicates the need for better alignment during the landing phase. Maintaining a consistent runway centerline alignment is essential for a safe and controlled landing.
Finally, in the Rollout Phase, the runway alignment being 6.0 m from the centerline suggests that there may have been some deviation from the intended path during the post-landing rollout. This aspect could benefit from improvement to ensure a straight and accurate exit from the runway.
Overall, while there are areas that could be refined, achieving a landing score of 96.2% is a commendable effort. There is clear evidence of skill and proficiency displayed throughout the landing process, with particular strengths seen in glideslope alignment, landing flare, and touchdown positioning. With some adjustments and continued practice, further enhancement in accuracy and precision can be achieved. Keep up the good work and continue to strive for excellence in all phases of aircraft landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values