Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Ease the nose up sooner to lift off at 125 kt instead of letting speed build on the ground.
What happened: The aircraft lifted off at 149 kt, 24 kt above the target liftoff speed.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator: 125 kt at liftoff
See Departure Roll
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 22 stages, 20 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,728 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 632 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 8 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The aircraft then departed from runway 10 at Nuremberg Airport (EDDN), with a takeoff distance of 1,302 meters, which accounted for 48% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 149 knots.
As the aircraft climbed to a higher altitude, it encountered local weather conditions of 20°C temperature and a 2-knot headwind at 89°. The enroute climb started 2 miles northwest of Schwaig, Bavaria, Germany, and reached an altitude of 38,319 feet above sea level, an increase of 36,209 feet in 27 minutes, covering a distance of 185 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered a level cruise phase, starting 2 miles northwest of Eisenerz, Steiermark, Austria, and lasted for 421 minutes, covering a distance of 1,422 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 14 miles west of Ras Gharib, Red Sea Governorate, Egypt, and descended from 38,776 feet to 8,797 feet above sea level, a decrease of 29,979 feet in 13 minutes, covering a distance of 89 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, starting 7 miles southwest of Hurghada International Airport (HEGN), Red Sea Governorate, Egypt, and lasted for 38 minutes, covering a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The enroute descent started 7 miles southwest of HEGN and descended from 8,742 feet to 4,446 feet above sea level, a decrease of 4,296 feet in 3 minutes, covering a distance of 7 nautical miles.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, starting 4 miles south of HEGN, and lasted for 5 minutes, covering a distance of 12 nautical miles. The enroute descent started 3 miles south of Makadi Bay, Red Sea Governorate, Egypt, and descended from 3,907 feet to 1,302 feet above sea level, a decrease of 2,605 feet in 2 minutes, covering a distance of 10 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 34R at HEGN was made from the south, heading 345.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,225 feet above ground level. The landing was made on runway 34R, which had a length of 3,728 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 128 knots.
The touchdown point was 209 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 122 knots, which was fast. The touchdown rate was good at -158 feet per minute. However, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 13.0 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were 34°C temperature and an 18-knot headwind at 340°.
The total landing distance was 1,262 meters, which accounted for 34% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was misaligned by 22.6 meters from the centerline. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile.
The total flight distance was 1,734 nautical miles, taking 222 minutes, and used 3,172 kilograms of fuel.
Aircraft C750 successfully landed at Hurghada International Airport (HEGN) on runway 34R, achieving an overall score of 85.4%. The final approach was initiated from the south, heading 345.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,225 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft touched down on the runway, with the threshold height being satisfactory. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target speed of 128 kt, indicating a slight deviation from the optimal landing speed. The touchdown point was located 209 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, which may indicate a slight over-shooting of the intended landing spot.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft's speed was recorded at 122 kt, which was faster than the optimal speed. Nevertheless, the touchdown rate was good, with a descent rate of -158 feet per minute (fpm). This suggests that the pilot maintained control of the aircraft during the landing, despite the slightly high touchdown speed.
The runway touchdown position was found to be misaligned by 13.0 meters from the centerline, indicating a slight deviation from the optimal landing path. This may be attributed to the crosswind component, which was relatively low at 1 kt. However, the headwind component was significant, at 18 kt, which may have contributed to the slight misalignment.
The total landing distance was recorded at 1,262 meters, which corresponds to 34% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the pilot successfully managed the aircraft's speed and descent rate during the landing.
During the rollout phase, the aircraft's alignment was found to be misaligned by 22.6 meters from the centerline. This may indicate a slight deviation from the optimal path during the rollout phase, which may be attributed to the pilot's actions or the aircraft's response to the crosswind and headwind components.
Overall, the landing was satisfactory, with the pilot demonstrating good control of the aircraft during the approach, touchdown, and rollout phases. However, there is room for improvement in terms of achieving the optimal landing speed and maintaining alignment with the centerline.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values