Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Shorten the long landing
Ground effect becomes significant below about one wingspan of height. A Cessna 172, with a 36 ft span, enters ground effect at flare height - the float it feels in the hold-off is ground effect arriving on cue. An A320, with a span around 117 ft, has been in ground effect since before the threshold and there is no sudden cushion to feel, only a gradual reduction in induced drag that lengthens any float you allow.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 15 stages, 15 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,194 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 288 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
First and foremost, let's highlight the positive aspects of the aircraft landing score of 94.0%. The Approach Phase was particularly commendable with excellent glideslope alignment, showcasing the pilot's superb precision and skill in guiding the aircraft towards the runway. This indicates a strong ability to maintain control and stability during the crucial approach phase of the landing.
Moving on to the Landing Phase, it's great to see that the threshold height was slightly below the target. This suggests a level of accuracy and attention to detail in ensuring a smooth descent onto the runway. Additionally, executing a perfect landing flare is no easy feat and is a testament to the pilot's expertise in controlling the aircraft during the final moments before touchdown.
While the Touchdown Phase did have some areas for improvement, such as a heavy touchdown rate and a slightly above target speed, it's important to recognize that these factors can often be influenced by external conditions and variables. The fact that the touchdown distance was inside the touchdown zone is a positive indication of the pilot's ability to accurately judge the landing approach.
Furthermore, although the runway touchdown position was 10.1 m from the centerline, this can be considered a minor deviation in the grand scheme of things. With continued practice and focus, this aspect can be further refined to achieve even greater precision in future landings.
Overall, a landing score of 94.0% is a strong achievement and reflects the pilot's proficiency and proficiency in handling the aircraft during various phases of the landing process. By building on the strengths displayed in the approach and landing phases, and working on refining the areas that need improvement in the touchdown phase, there is great potential for even better scores in future landings. Keep up the excellent work and continue striving for excellence in every flight!
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values