Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Use smaller, smoother aileron inputs to hold the climb bank angle near wings-level.
What happened: During Climb 3 the bank angle averaged 2.2°, well beyond a steady wings-level climb.
Watch for: Attitude indicator - bank angle, keeping it close to wings-level through the climb.
Arrival
Raise the nose more slowly in the flare and stop as soon as the sink is checked; if it balloons, hold the attitude.
What happened: The flare ballooned, with 272 fpm of sink returning after the arrest; a balloon like this usually carries through to a firm touchdown, as it did here at 756 fpm.
Watch for: The runway ahead: the aircraft still sinking gently towards it through the flare, never rising.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 305 m and 152 m above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,587 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 233 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 15 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, then departed from runway 35R at LIMC Milan Malpensa International Airport. The takeoff distance was 1,567 meters, which accounted for 53% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 150 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 37 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 13 knots from a direction of 260 degrees. There was a crosswind of 13 knots and a headwind of 0 knots. The aircraft began its enroute climb 1 mile southwest of Casorate Sempione, in the Lombardia region of Italy. The climb took 21 minutes and covered a distance of 109 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from an altitude of 535 meters above sea level to 11,088 meters above sea level, an increase of 10,553 meters.
Following the enroute climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 4 miles northwest of Fontan, in the Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur region of France. This phase lasted for 32 minutes and covered a distance of 226 nautical miles. The enroute descent began 40 miles southeast of Llafranc, in the Catalunya region of Spain. The descent took 25 minutes and covered a distance of 117 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from an altitude of 11,081 meters above sea level to 405 meters above sea level, a decrease of 10,676.2 meters.
The final approach to runway 24L at LEPA Palma de Mallorca Airport was made from the northeast, heading 239.0 degrees at an altitude of 394.2 meters above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 24L, which had a length of 2,587 meters. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was slightly above the target speed at 154 knots. The touchdown distance was good at 232 meters, but the touchdown speed was a little fast at 150 knots. The touchdown rate was very heavy at -4.3 meters per second. The runway touchdown alignment was very good.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 32 degrees Celsius and a wind speed of 10 knots from a direction of 230 degrees. There was a crosswind of 1 knot and a headwind of 10 knots. The total landing distance was 1,513 meters, which accounted for 58% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was very good. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 4 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 462 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 99 minutes. The aircraft used 4,161 kilograms of fuel during the flight.
The Boeing 737-800 aircraft successfully landed at LEPA Palma de Mallorca Airport, with a final approach score of 91.5%. The aircraft was approaching the runway from the north east, heading 239.0° at an altitude of 394.2 meters above ground level (agl) and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway.
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down on runway 24L, which has a length of 2,587 meters. The threshold height was reported as good, indicating that the aircraft was at the correct height as it approached the runway. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target speed of 154 knots, which may have been due to various factors such as wind resistance or the aircraft's weight.
The touchdown distance was good, measuring 232 meters, which is within the acceptable range. However, the touchdown speed of 150 knots was a little fast, indicating that the aircraft may have been descending too quickly or that the pilots may have been unable to slow it down sufficiently. The touchdown rate was also very heavy, measuring -4.3 meters per second, which is higher than the recommended rate.
Despite these minor issues, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was aligned with the runway and was on course for a safe landing. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were hot, with a temperature of 32°C, and a moderate headwind of 10 knots from a direction of 230°. The crosswind was minimal, measuring only 1 knot.
The total landing distance was 1,513 meters, which is 58% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating that the aircraft was able to slow down quickly and come to a stop within a short distance. The runway rollout alignment was also very good, indicating that the aircraft was able to maintain its alignment with the runway as it rolled out.
Overall, the landing was successful, with the aircraft coming to a safe stop on the runway. However, there were some minor issues with the touchdown speed and rate, which may have been due to various factors such as wind resistance or the aircraft's weight.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values