Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Monitor your taxi speed
Twenty knots on a monitor produces the visual sensation of about ten. The advice to "taxi at a walking pace" cannot fix this, because your sense of walking pace is exactly the thing that's broken. Put the groundspeed readout in your scan and obey it for the next fifty flights, the way a student pilot leans on the airspeed indicator before learning to read attitude.
Read more in How to Taxi AnywhereStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed 41 kt FAST on the reference speed of 118 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,698 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,698 m of the 2,644 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 698 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Oslo Airport, Gardermoen, the aircraft began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 9 minutes and covered a distance of 5 nautical miles. As it rolled down runway 19R, the aircraft accelerated to a liftoff speed of 134 knots, clearing the ground at a distance of 794 meters, which accounted for 22% of the runway's length. The local weather conditions at the time of departure featured a temperature of 10°C, with a headwind of 15 knots at 200 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed to its enroute cruise altitude, it traversed a distance of 83 nautical miles, increasing its altitude by 31,698 feet in 13 minutes. The climb phase was followed by a brief level cruise, lasting 2 minutes and covering 14 nautical miles, before the aircraft began its descent towards Stavanger Airport, Sola. The descent phase saw the aircraft lose 31,603 feet in altitude over a distance of 104 nautical miles, taking 19 minutes to complete. The aircraft then leveled off for another brief period, lasting 2 minutes and covering 5 nautical miles, before climbing to a higher altitude near Tananger. The final descent phase saw the aircraft lose 551 feet in altitude over a distance of 5 nautical miles, before leveling off once more for a prolonged period of 11 minutes, covering 42 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached Stavanger Airport, Sola, it began its final approach to runway 18, aligning itself with the runway at a heading of 179.0 degrees. The landing was executed with a touchdown speed of 104 knots, which was within the acceptable range. However, the touchdown point was 273 meters beyond the touchdown zone, and the runway touchdown position was slightly misaligned by 5.2 meters from the centerline. The total landing distance was 1,608 meters, accounting for 64% of the runway's length. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 3 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 269 nautical miles, with a total flight time of 62 minutes and a fuel consumption of 863 kilograms.
The final approach to runway 18 at ENZV Stavanger Airport, Sola, was conducted from the north, heading 179.0° at 4 nm and 1,323 ft above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a threshold height at 59 ft agl that was slightly above the target. The threshold speed was good at 120 kt, indicating a well-executed approach.
As the aircraft touched down on the runway, the touchdown point was 273 m beyond the touchdown zone, and the touchdown speed was 104 kt, which was within the acceptable range. However, the touchdown rate of -226 fpm was slightly higher than desired, indicating a slightly steeper descent than intended. The runway touchdown position was also slightly misaligned by 5.2 m from the centreline, which may have been due to crosswind or pilot error.
The total landing distance was 1,608 m, accounting for 64% of the runway length. The runway rollout alignment was also slightly misaligned by 13.0 m from the centreline. Despite these minor deviations, the overall performance of the landing was satisfactory, earning a score of 89.1%. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 11 °C and wind at 16 kt at 130°, may have contributed to the slight misalignments experienced during the landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values