Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Apply small rudder corrections against a point at the far end of the runway to hold the centreline during the roll.
What happened: The aircraft tracked 8.4 m off the runway centreline during the ground roll, and flights with this pattern usually carry extra bank, around 3.1°, into the first climb.
Watch for: Heading indicator: wings level, tracking the runway centreline
Arrival
Keep the back pressure coming once the flare is established, holding the nose up through to touchdown instead of easing it.
What happened: The flare arrested the sink but 102 fpm of it came back before touchdown, and in flights like this one that returning sink usually carries through to a firm or hard touchdown at 409 fpm.
Watch for: Vertical speed indicator: the sink held near zero all the way through touchdown, not allowed to build back up.
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
At the 1,000 ft gate: speed above the reference speed.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,965 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,965 m of the 3,595 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 574 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a taxiing period from the parking to the runway, which took 18 minutes and covered a distance of 4 nautical miles. The aircraft, a Boeing 777-300, then departed from runway 36L at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol. The takeoff distance was 2,145 meters, which accounted for 61% of the runway. The liftoff speed was 181 knots.
The local weather conditions at the time of departure were characterized by a temperature of 17 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 6 knots at 19 degrees. The crosswind was 2 knots, while the headwind was 6 knots. The aircraft then began its enroute climb, starting 1 mile northeast of Vijfhuizen, a town in the province of Noord-Holland, the Netherlands. The climb took 16 minutes and covered a distance of 96 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from 1,025 feet above sea level to 34,993 feet above sea level, an increase of 33,969 feet.
Following the initial climb, the aircraft entered a level cruise phase, which started 2 miles southwest of Billerbeck, a town in the state of Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany. This phase lasted for 127 minutes and covered a distance of 1,065 nautical miles. The aircraft then began another climb, this time starting 73 miles east of Ahtopol, a town in the province of Burgas, Bulgaria. The climb took only 2 minutes and covered a distance of 14 nautical miles, during which the aircraft ascended from 34,973 feet above sea level to 36,887 feet above sea level, an increase of 1,914 feet.
The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase, which started 68 miles north of Sile, a town in the province of Istanbul, Turkey. This phase lasted for 191 minutes and covered a distance of 1,515 nautical miles. As the aircraft approached its destination, it began its descent, starting 35 miles southwest of OIBK Kish International Airport, located on Kish Island in the Hormozgan Province of Iran. The descent took 29 minutes and covered a distance of 119 nautical miles, during which the aircraft descended from 37,576 feet above sea level to 1,375 feet above sea level, a decrease of 36,201 feet.
The final approach to runway 30L at OMDB Dubai International Airport was made from the southeast, with the aircraft heading 301.0 degrees at an altitude of 1,339 feet above ground level and a distance of 4 nautical miles from the runway. The landing was made on runway 30L, which had a length of 3,595 meters. The threshold height at 72 feet above ground level was well above the target, while the threshold speed was good at 144 knots.
The touchdown point was 146 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 136 knots, which was a little fast. The touchdown rate was firm at -322 feet per minute. The runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.4 meters from the centerline. The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 36 degrees Celsius, with a wind speed of 11 knots at 310 degrees. The crosswind was 2 knots, while the headwind was 11 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,873 meters, which accounted for 52% of the runway. The runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 9.2 meters from the centerline. The taxiing period from the runway to the parking took 5 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 2,821 nautical miles, which was covered in 386 minutes, and
The Boeing 777-300 aircraft successfully landed on runway 30L at Dubai International Airport (OMDB) with a score of 84.6%. The final approach was initiated from the south east, heading 301.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,339 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft touched down on the runway, with the threshold height being well above the target, indicating a safe margin for the landing. The threshold speed was also satisfactory at 144 knots, demonstrating the pilot's ability to control the aircraft's descent and speed. However, the touchdown speed of 136 knots was slightly faster than the desired speed, which may have resulted in a firmer touchdown.
The touchdown point was located 146 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The touchdown rate of -322 feet per minute (fpm) was firm, indicating a controlled descent. Unfortunately, the runway touchdown position was misaligned by 9.4 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a slight deviation in the pilot's alignment or a minor issue with the aircraft's navigation system.
The local weather conditions at the time of landing were characterized by a temperature of 36°C and a wind speed of 11 knots from a direction of 310°. The crosswind component was minimal at 2 knots, while the headwind component was 11 knots, which may have contributed to the slight deviation in the touchdown position.
The total landing distance was 1,873 meters, which is 52% of the runway length. This is a relatively short landing distance, indicating the pilot's skill and control over the aircraft. However, the runway rollout alignment was slightly misaligned by 9.2 meters from the centerline, which may have been due to a minor issue with the aircraft's brakes or a slight deviation in the pilot's alignment.
Overall, the landing was successful, but there were some minor deviations in the touchdown position and speed. The pilot's skill and control over the aircraft were demonstrated by the short landing distance and firm touchdown rate. However, there is room for improvement in terms of alignment and speed control.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values