Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Improve the takeoff
The rudder input is a changing profile through the roll rather than one that is held. So the demand on your right foot starts large at power application, eases as speed builds and the rudder gains authority, then jumps again at rotation.
Read more in Improve Your Take-OffsStart to finish · 20 stages, 18 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,654 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,654 m of the 2,996 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 622 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with the aircraft, an Airbus A319, taxiing from the parking area to the runway at Innsbruck Airport, taking approximately 6 minutes to cover less than 1 nautical mile. Departure roll took place on runway 08, with the takeoff distance covering 62% of the runway's length at 1,176 meters. The liftoff speed was 131 knots.
As the aircraft took to the skies, it encountered local weather conditions of 22°C temperature and winds of 10 knots at 218 degrees. The crosswind was 7 knots, while the tailwind was 8 knots. The enroute climb started overhead Innsbruck, with the aircraft ascending from 2,957 feet above sea level to 37,453 feet, an increase of 34,496 feet in 17 minutes, covering a distance of 55 nautical miles.
The enroute level cruise began overhead Fürstenfeldbruck Air Base in Germany, lasting 52 minutes and covering 379 nautical miles. The aircraft then started its enroute descent 9 miles northwest of Ostseebad Ahrenshoop, Germany, descending from 37,403 feet to 2,971 feet in 14 minutes, covering 52 nautical miles. A brief level cruise followed, lasting 2 minutes and covering 6 nautical miles, before the aircraft began its descent again 6 miles east of Koge, Denmark.
The final descent took the aircraft from 2,973 feet to 1,302 feet in 2 minutes, covering 8 nautical miles. The aircraft then began its final approach to runway 04L at Copenhagen Kastrup Airport from the southwest, heading 41.0 degrees at 4 nautical miles and 1,278 feet above ground level.
The landing took place on runway 04L, which was 2,996 meters long. The threshold height was good, and the threshold speed was also satisfactory at 122 knots. The touchdown point was 200 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 114 knots, which was good. However, the touchdown rate was fair at -204 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the local weather conditions were 20°C temperature and winds of 11 knots at 350 degrees, with a crosswind of 8 knots and a headwind of 7 knots.
The total landing distance was 1,567 meters, covering 52% of the runway's length. The runway rollout alignment was very good. Taxiing to the parking area from the runway took 10 minutes, covering 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 508 nautical miles, taking 105 minutes, and the aircraft used 3,804 kilograms of fuel.
The Airbus A319 aircraft successfully landed at EKCH Copenhagen Kastrup Airport, achieving a high score of 96.5%. The final approach to runway 04L was conducted from the southwest, with a heading of 41.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,278 feet above ground level (agl).
The aircraft's performance during the landing was satisfactory, with a good threshold height and a threshold speed of 122 knots. The touchdown point was located 200 meters beyond the touchdown zone, which is a relatively minor deviation. The touchdown speed of 114 knots was also within acceptable limits, indicating a smooth and controlled descent.
However, the touchdown rate of -204 feet per minute (fpm) was only fair, suggesting that the aircraft may have experienced a slightly higher-than-desired rate of descent during the final stages of the landing. Nevertheless, the runway touchdown alignment was perfect, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline.
The local weather conditions at the time of the landing were favorable, with a temperature of 20°C and a wind speed of 11 knots from a direction of 350°. The crosswind component was 8 knots, while the headwind component was 7 knots. These conditions would have required the pilot to make some adjustments to the aircraft's approach and landing configuration.
The total landing distance of 1,567 meters was 52% of the runway length, which is a relatively short distance considering the aircraft's size and weight. The runway rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the aircraft was properly aligned with the runway centerline during the rollout phase.
Overall, the landing was successful, and the aircraft's performance was satisfactory, with only minor deviations from the ideal landing parameters. The pilot's skills and experience were evident in the smooth and controlled descent, and the aircraft's systems performed as expected.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values