Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Departure
Make small rudder corrections against a point at the far end to hold the centreline.
What happened: During the ground roll you drifted 4.8 m off the runway centreline.
Watch for: Watch runway alignment against the centreline, correcting with small rudder inputs.
See Departure Roll
Arrival
Reduce power earlier on approach to be at 136 kt by the stabilisation gate, not just by the threshold.
What happened: The approach was too fast at the stabilisation gate, crossing the threshold at 137 kt against a VREF of 136 kt.
Watch for: Airspeed indicator against 136 kt at the stabilisation gate.
See Arrival Approach
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 19 stages, 17 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
Two stabilised approach gates, each with seven checks, where the approach path is 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway. They are the approach's score: the checks passed out of the checks that ran.
At the 1,000 ft gate: gear still up and speed 74 kt FAST on the reference speed of 136 kt.
At the 500 ft gate: speed 41 kt FAST on the reference speed of 136 kt.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,448 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
The 423 m touchdown sits inside the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Liverpool John Lennon Airport, the Airbus A320 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 6 minutes and covered a distance of 3 nautical miles. As the aircraft reached the end of the runway, it initiated its departure roll on runway 27, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 152 knots. The takeoff distance of 1,370 meters accounted for 62% of the runway length, with the aircraft clearing the ground in a relatively short distance.
As the aircraft climbed away from the airport, it began its enroute climb, reaching an altitude of 3,980 feet above sea level in just 2 minutes, covering a distance of 6 nautical miles. The climb continued in stages, with the aircraft reaching a cruising altitude of 33,009 feet above sea level after a 16-minute climb from 4,010 feet. The aircraft then entered a level cruise, maintaining its altitude for various periods of time as it traversed the English and Dutch skies. The descent phase began 18 miles north-east of Hemsby, with the aircraft losing 23,000 feet in just 11 minutes, covering a distance of 82 nautical miles.
As the aircraft approached its destination, Amsterdam Airport Schiphol, it initiated its final approach to runway 27, aligning itself with the runway from the east. The landing was executed smoothly, with the aircraft touching down at a speed of 133 knots and a distance of 431 meters. The touchdown rate was fair, and the runway touchdown alignment was very good. After landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 5 minutes and covered a distance of 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 326 nautical miles, with the aircraft using 2,307 kilograms of fuel over a flight time of 58 minutes.
The final approach to runway 27 at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol was executed from the east, with the aircraft heading 267.0° at 4 nautical miles and 1,202 feet above ground level. The approach quality was satisfactory, with a good threshold height achieved. However, the threshold speed was slightly above the target at 138 knots, indicating a slight deviation from the optimal landing speed.
Upon touchdown, the aircraft exhibited a touchdown distance of 431 meters, which was within acceptable limits. The touchdown speed of 133 knots was a little fast, resulting in a fair touchdown rate of -288 feet per minute. Despite this, the runway touchdown alignment was very good, demonstrating precise control and coordination from the pilots. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 12°C and a headwind of 11 knots, contributed to a smooth and controlled approach.
The total landing distance of 1,032 meters, accounting for 31% of the runway length, was within acceptable limits. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, showcasing the pilots' ability to maintain control and stability during the critical phases of the landing. Overall, the landing was scored 99.3%, reflecting a high level of proficiency and adherence to standard operating procedures.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values