Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 18 stages, 16 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 2,847 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 581 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Departing from Helsinki Vantaa Airport, the Boeing 737-600 began its journey by taxiing from the parking area to the runway, a process that took 5 minutes and covered a distance of 2 nautical miles. As it reached the runway, the aircraft started its departure roll on runway 22L, accelerating to a liftoff speed of 141 knots. The takeoff distance of 1,035 meters accounted for 32% of the runway length, with the aircraft clearing the ground at a height of 1,098 feet above sea level.
As the aircraft climbed out of Helsinki Vantaa Airport, it began its enroute climb, reaching a cruising altitude of 37,703 feet above sea level in 30 minutes, covering a distance of 204 nautical miles. The climb was characterized by a steady increase in altitude, with the aircraft eventually reaching its cruising level. The enroute level cruise phase that followed lasted 68 minutes, during which the aircraft covered a distance of 493 nautical miles. The descent phase began 1 mile south east of JadeWeser Airport Wilhelmshaven, with the aircraft descending from 37,778 feet to 1,290 feet above sea level in 24 minutes, covering a distance of 146 nautical miles.
The final approach to runway 18C at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol was conducted from the north, with the aircraft aligning itself with the runway at a height of 1,281 feet above ground level. The landing was executed with a threshold speed slightly above the target, at 130 knots. The touchdown point was 158 meters beyond the touchdown zone, with a touchdown speed of 122 knots and a touchdown rate of -188 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, and the runway rollout alignment was also satisfactory. The total landing distance of 1,069 meters accounted for 38% of the runway length. Following the landing, the aircraft taxied to the parking area, a process that took 2 minutes and covered a distance of less than 1 nautical mile. The total flight distance was 852 nautical miles, with a total fuel consumption of 5,778 kilograms.
The Boeing 737-600 touched down on runway 18C at EHAM Amsterdam Airport Schiphol with a satisfactory approach quality, despite a slightly above-target threshold speed of 130 kt. The aircraft maintained a good threshold height, allowing for a controlled descent onto the runway. The touchdown point was 158 meters beyond the designated touchdown zone, indicating a slight over-shoot.
The touchdown speed of 122 kt was a little faster than desired, but the touchdown rate of -188 feet per minute was within acceptable limits. The runway touchdown alignment was perfect, with the aircraft centered on the runway centerline. The local weather conditions, with a temperature of 7 °C and a light headwind of 2 kt, contributed to a smooth landing. The aircraft's performance was further enhanced by the minimal crosswind component of 2 kt.
The total landing distance of 1,069 meters was 38% of the available runway length, indicating a relatively short rollout. The runway rollout alignment was perfect, with the aircraft remaining centered on the runway centerline throughout the deceleration phase. Overall, the landing was considered satisfactory, with a score of 98.5% reflecting the minor deviations from the desired touchdown speed and point.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values