Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Work on the flare
Arrive slow and the sink rate at the threshold is already above schedule, the flare is short because there is no energy to extend it, and the touchdown is hard in a way that feels exactly like a late flare. Diagnosing a slow arrival as a late flare is the catastrophic misread: you respond by flaring earlier, which bleeds more speed, which makes the next one worse. The tiebreaker is threshold speed against VRef, not feel. Never diagnose a flare without it.
Read more in Flare TimingStart to finish · 26 stages, 25 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
The threshold, the flare and the hold-off. The approach that led to it is the stabilisation gates below.
One stabilised approach gate: five checks where the approach path is 500 ft above the runway. The 1,000 ft gate was not assessed, because the approach did not join final that far out.
Side view — the last 1,524 m of the approach.
Plan view — the first 1,524 m of the 3,040 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 654 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
Overall, the aircraft landing score of 74.3% indicates room for improvement in various phases of the landing process. However, it is important to acknowledge the positive aspects of the touchdown phase, where the touchdown rate was good and the speed was on target.
In the approach phase, the poor descent path above the glideslope limit and slightly above target speed are areas that can be addressed by adjusting the approach angle and monitoring speed more closely. By making small corrections during the approach, the aircraft can stay within the desired parameters for a smoother landing.
During the landing phase, the significantly above target threshold height and very poor landing flare suggest a need for better coordination and communication between the pilot and the control tower. Ensuring that the aircraft is properly aligned and at the correct altitude before landing can help prevent deviations from the desired landing profile.
In the touchdown phase, the touchdown point being 223 m beyond the touchdown zone and the runway touchdown position being 19.2 m from the centerline indicate a need for better spatial awareness and alignment during the final moments of the landing. Paying closer attention to the runway markings and using visual cues can help the pilot make more accurate landings.
It is important to note the warning about landing with a 7 kn tailwind, as this can affect the handling characteristics of the aircraft and increase the landing distance. Avoiding tailwind landings whenever possible can help improve overall safety during the landing process.
Finally, in the rollout phase, the runway alignment being 20.4 m from the centerline suggests a need for improved tracking and steering control during the taxiing phase. By practicing precise control inputs and maintaining awareness of the runway centerline, the pilot can make smoother exits from the runway.
Overall, while there are areas for improvement in the landing score, it is important to view this feedback as an opportunity to learn and grow as a pilot. By focusing on areas of weakness and making targeted improvements, future landings can become more consistent and successful. Keep practicing and stay focused on safety and precision in every phase of flight.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values