Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
MY FS FLIGHTS
Flight Score
Configure earlier
Preparing for a stable approach will give you time to decide on whether to attempt the landing or going around. Too much altitude with a high sink rate will result in carrying too much speed onto the runway. Configuring flaps and the gear late also won't help the speed decay.
Read more in The Stabilised ApproachStart to finish · 27 stages, 26 scored
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Events
Two stabilised approach gates, each with six checks at 1,000 ft and 500 ft above the runway.
The approach, gate by gate
Side view — the last 793 m of the approach.
Plan view — the full 793 m runway, to the same scale as the side view.
Touched down 526 m past the threshold — beyond the full-score zone. The arrival was smooth.
The rest of the report
The flight began with a departure roll from runway 30 at Forlì Airport (LIPK), with the Tecnam P2006T MKII taking off in 117 meters, which is just 5% of the runway. The aircraft lifted off at a speed of 66 knots, taking advantage of the favorable weather conditions - a temperature of 28 degrees Celsius and a light wind of 4 knots at a direction of 21 degrees.
As the aircraft climbed out of Forlì Airport, it began its initial climb at an altitude of 1,103 feet above sea level, and within 3 minutes, it had reached 3,980 feet, covering a distance of 3 nautical miles. This marked the start of the enroute level cruise phase, which lasted for 3 minutes and covered 8 nautical miles.
However, the flight soon entered its first descent phase, during which the aircraft lost 576 feet in altitude in just 2 minutes, covering 4 nautical miles. After level cruising for a short while near Cesena, the aircraft began its second descent phase from 3,164 feet to 489 feet, losing 2,676 feet in the process. The flight then entered a series of level cruises and climbs, during which the aircraft covered various distances and changed altitudes.
One of these climbs was particularly notable, as the aircraft increased its altitude by 3,442 feet in just 3 minutes, covering 6 nautical miles. The flight then began its final descent phase, during which it lost 605 feet in altitude in 2 minutes, covering 4 nautical miles. The aircraft then entered another level cruise phase and began its final descent into Lugo Francesco Baracca Airfield (LIDG), where the flight intended to land on runway 03.
As the aircraft began its final approach to runway 03, it was flying at an altitude of 1,472 feet above ground level and was heading at a direction of 47 degrees. The aircraft was at a distance of 4 nautical miles from the airport, and the wind was light, blowing at a speed of 2 knots from a direction of 38 degrees.
The landing was completed with the aircraft touching down at the end of the runway, 708 meters from the start of the threshold. The touchdown point was long, using more than 50% of the available runway, but the touchdown speed was good at 64 knots, and the touchdown rate was perfect at 14 feet per minute. The runway touchdown alignment was also perfect.
After landing, the aircraft taxied off the runway, using the remaining 89% of the runway's length, and the runway rollout alignment was very good. In total, the flight distance was 79 nautical miles, and the flight duration was 51 minutes, consuming 21 kilograms of fuel in the process.
The Tecnam P2006T MKII has successfully landed at LIDG Lugo Francesco Baracca Airfield, achieving an impressive score of 86.0%. The final approach to runway 03 was conducted from the south-west, heading 47.0° at a distance of 4 nautical miles and an altitude of 1,472 feet above ground level (agl).
Upon landing, the aircraft touched down at a location that utilized more than 50% of the available runway, which was 793 meters in length. This suggests that the pilot had a bit of a challenging time with the landing roll, possibly due to factors such as the aircraft's momentum or the effectiveness of the brakes. Nevertheless, the touchdown speed of 64 knots was deemed good, and the touchdown rate of 14 feet per minute (fpm) was considered perfect.
The approach conditions were generally favorable, with a temperature of 27°C and a relatively low wind speed of 2 knots at 38°. The crosswind component was negligible at 0 knots, while the headwind component was minimal at 2 knots. The good threshold height and high threshold speed of 83 knots, which was well above the target, indicate a well-executed approach.
In the post-landing assessment, the total landing distance of 708 meters was found to be 89% of the available runway. This is a relatively high percentage, suggesting that the aircraft could have been brought to a stop more efficiently. Nonetheless, the rollout alignment was very good, indicating that the pilot had achieved good directional control after the landing.
Overall, this landing performance suggests that the pilot has room for improvement in managing the landing roll, but has demonstrated a solid understanding of the required techniques and procedures for a safe and successful landing.
Scroll or drag the slider to zoom · double-click to reset · hover for values